I think it would be important for the one jurist to vote not guilty ie to have the courage to do so because for someone to be penalized for something they didn't do is ia very serious thing especially if the sentence is a lengthy one so the other members of the jury should be made to explain just why they think the way they do and not go unchallenged.
Answer:
MISSING INFORMATION ATTACHED
Explanation:
The sales forecasted plus the desired ending inventory is the complete needs the sales department expect to be fullfill
Then, as the company has a beginning invneotry each period a portion of this needs is already fullfil thus, the difference are the production requirements.
Answer:
The incorrect option is D. The inventory shrinkage cannot be recognized by debiting an operating expense.
Explanation: Even though it is correct saying that diminishing inventories will have an impact on the P&L sheet through debiting the records, it is incorrect booking that operation in the expenses. Inventories are affected by cost variations, so the debt must go in Cost of goods sold (option c). The other options are correct since Inventory shrinkage refers to a loss in physical inventory not recognized yet in the accounting (option a and b). This loss can be caused by deterioration or robbery (option e).
Answer:
Three types of damages
Explanation:
Under the negligence Act, Jonathan has breached duty of care to Veronica by not complying with driving rules and as a result he will have to compensate Veronica. The compensation would include the financial loss of decline in the price of the vehicle, the pain she suffered due to health damage and the income loss due to health damage. And the amount of money that Janathan would pay would be decided by the court and depends upon the loss that she has beared.
Answer:
Explained below.
Explanation:
In option (a) no it does not contribute to the US GDP in any year. The transaction appears in expenditure as an increase in consumption and a decrease in net exports that offset. According to option (b) yes it contributes to US GDP in 2013. The transaction appears as an increase in investment (increase in inventory). In 2014, the transaction appears as an increase in net exports offset by a decrease in investment. According to option (c), the transaction appears in expenditure as an increase in consumption in 2014 offset by a decrease in net exports. Option (d) represents the transaction appears as an increase in investment (increase in inventory). In 2014, the transaction appears as an increase in consumption offset by a decrease in investment. According to option (e) yes, it contributes $1000 to US GDP in 2014. The $6000 purchase price exceeds the price paid by the used car dealer. The difference represents value added by the dealership - this is a service that should be counted as part of GDP.