A larger company can benefit from <em>economies of scale</em>, meaning they can get discounts by purchasing and producing in bulk which a smaller company wouldn't have the ability to do. A larger store also has the potential for higher revenue because they have more goods and services to sell.
The EOQ is 980 units and should reduce the fixed ordering cost to an amount of $62.50.
<u>Explanation:</u>
a)
Annual demand=Qty per mth multiply with 12 = 1000 multiply with 12 =12000
Annual demand in USD, A= 12000 multiply with USD 100 (cost of each part) = USD 1200000
Preparation cost, P= 4 hrs changeover time multiply with USD 250 per hr = USD 1000
Annual holding cost, I = 25% = 0.25
EOQ in USD= Root over (2 multiply with A multiply with P divide by I ) = USD 9.79 multiply with 10000 = USD 98000
EOQ in nos. = USD 98000 divide by USD 100 (cos of each part) = 980 units
b) Q = 980 divide by 4 = 245
In this case, annual carryring cost, C = EOQ 980 by 4 multiply with 0.5 multiply with Unit cost USD 100 multiply with 0.25 = USD 3062.50
Annual demand, D = 1000 per month multiply with 12 = 12000
Ordering cost = C multiply with 245 / D = USD 62.50
Answer:
$11,947
Explanation:
The following expenses shall be allowed as qualified higher education expense to Jose for the purpose of his son Qualified tuition program
Tuition Fees $6,400
Room and board $4,775
Books $772
Total expenses to be allowed $11,947
Answer: Debit Account Payable $1600, Credit Cash $1600
Explanation:
If the perpetual inventory system, and purchases are recorded through the use of a gross method, the correct journal entry to record the payment on July 28 will be to Debit Account Payable $1600, and then Credit Cash $1600.
In this case, we should note that we don't need any adjustment for discount. This is because the payment made was on the 28th of July.
Answer:
The solutions is given in the attached figure
Explanation:
The values are calculated using the appropriate formulas in Excel. The formulas are as indicated in the attached figure.
