Answer:
The answer is "Option b".
Explanation:
Logically, the replacement of rule is the rule of substitution that could only lead to a specific part of the logical expression, it is identical phrases will start replacing each other within the structure of valid logic.
- It is the probabilistic reasoning, replacement laws are applicable to manipulate initiatives.
- This rule of inference is being used only for the whole linear combination, that can be substituted by a rule of substitution.
Answer:
B. People face trade-offs.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A. Larry can use time most efficiently by spending the same amounts of time on swimming, biking, and running.
B. People face trade-offs.
C. People usually exploit opportunities to make themselves better off.
D. Larry has an incentive to spend more time on swimming than on biking or running.
The basic principle that these choices illustrate is that people face trade-offs when trying to decide what the right course of action is at any particular moment. In this example, Larry has three tasks that he needs to complete: swimming, biking and running. However, dedicating time to one of this leads to less time for the other ones. Therefore, Larry faces a trade-off. This concept is closely related to the idea of opportunity costs.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B. He helped negotiate peace <span>agreements between Israeli and PLO leaders. C. He helped bring about a stock-market surge, low unemployment, minimal inflation, and general prosperity. D. He supported a welfare reform billed that increased the number of people receiving welfare."</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is A) continues to generate substantial controversy, despite the lengthy enumeration of powers in the Constitution.
Explanation:
The question of Congress power continues to be controversial day by day in political life. One classical example is the question of war. According to the constitution, it's the Senate, not the president, who can declare war on another nation. Despite this, the Senate has not declared formally declared war since 1942, but ever since, presidents have used executive power for military action many times.
