Answer:
b. $3,000
Explanation:
Jed was refused payment of $5000, the court awarded only $2000, rest $3000 is a loss for Jed. He can only deduct $3000 and not full $5000 as $2000 has been realized.
Therefore, The amount of loss may Jed deduct in the current year is $3,000.
Answer:
committed the fallacy of avoiding the issue.
Explanation:
The fallacy of avoiding the issue is also called the fallacy of irelevant conclusion or a red herring.
It occurs when an individual avoids dealing with an issue that he has a problem with.
In the given scenario the issue is whether bluegrass is better than Alfa Alfa for cattle in the Midwest.
Instead of Juan to address the issue he is arguing that the U.S. Department of Agriculture is a bloated bureaucracy with too much fat that deserves to be cut in the next federal budget bill.
He is not addressing the main issue
Explanation:
The journal entry is as follows:
Land Dr $70,000
Additional paid in capital $5,000
To Common stock $75,000
(Being the common stock is issued in exchanged for cash)
The computation of the additional paid in capital is shown below:
= Common stock - the appraised value of land
where,
The common stock = 750 shares × $100 = $75,000
And, the appraised value of land is $70,000
So, the remaining balance is
= $75,000 - $70,000
= $5,000
The $5,000 would be recorded as an additional paid in capital
Answer:
Because the government can use her sovereign power to both mitigate negative externalities as well as encourage positive externalities.
Explanation:
A positive externality occurs when the transaction between a producer and end user benefits a third party that did not take art in the process.
A very Good example is Education. There is a third party benefit to the society when we have more educated citizens.
A negative externality happens when the business transaction between a manufacturer and consumer affects a third party adversely. a typical example is cigarettes. When cigarettes is consumed by the end user, the smoke can affect the health of a third party that was not part of the initial transaction.
To deal with both positive and negative externalities, government intervention is very crucial.
Government encourages positive externalities like education by subsidizing the cost of attending a school. They also enact laws that make basic education compulsory.
In the case of negative externalities, Government can intervene with a ban on producing harmful goods and also set a legislation about smoking in public laces to mitigate the health complications caused by third party inhalation.
