"The power to prevent harmful speech against government" was the power given to Congress by the “clear and present danger” rule.
<u>Option: B</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
It is a doctrine introduced by the U.S. Supreme Court to decide in which conditions to impose limitations on the First Amendments. This was developed in the Schenck vs. US situation. This was a freedom of speech test so it's not being abused for the country's assault.
The "clear and present danger" principle advocated the use of an improvement test to monitor the state's limits of free speech on a case-by-case basis. If the Court found that there was a "clear and present danger" that the discussion would produce mischief that Congress had taboo, then the state would be legitimized in restricting the discussion at that stage.
<span>Infant Industry Argument- to protect developing domestic markets from foreign competitors
Industry Diversification Argument- to prevent over reliance on one country or natural resource
Anti-Dumping Argument- to prevent another country from drastically lower the cost temporarily as a means to drown out domestic competition.
Pauper Labor Argument- To prevent countries with cheap labor from competing with domestic competitors</span>
Answer:
The South had more plantations than the North.
