When the writers of the Constitution were initially deciding what powers and responsibilities the executive branch—headed by the president—would have, they were heavily influenced by their experience with the British government under King George III. Having seen how the king and other European monarchs tended to abuse their powers, the designers of the Constitution wanted to place strict limits on the power that the president would have. At the same time, they wanted to give the president enough power to conduct foreign policy and to run the federal government efficiently without being hampered by the squabbling of legislators from individual states. In other words, the Framers wanted to design an executive office that would provide effective and coherent leadership but that could never become a tyranny.
Read more: Executive Branch - The Executive Branch And The Constitution - President, Power, Powers, and Framers - JRank Articles https://law.jrank.org/pages/6652/Executive-Branch-Executive-Branch-Constitution.html#ixzz6rIgGN7y3
Answer:
The Supreme Court held that Premier Duplessis' cancellation of Roncarelli's liquor licence violated the Rule of Law because this action constituted an abuse of the Premier's powerful position.
Explanation:
Ur welcome
Answer:
The Racketeer Influenced and Corruption Organizations Act
Explanation:
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO), is a US federal law that gives criminal penalties that could be extended depending on the criminal act. Moreover, it is a civil cause of action that reprehends the acts performed by a criminal organization (bribery, kidnapping, money laundering, trafficking, etc). This law was established to prosecute mafia members, gangs, among other criminal associations. Specifically, it focuses on racketeering; and criminals are tried for the crimes they committed or assisted.