Answer:
the answer is social because i learned it like two days ago. this was kinda easy tho
Explanation:
The election of Andrew Jackson dramatically changed the US for several different reasons including:
1) He was an advocate for the "average citizen"- Andrew Jackson was dubbed the "Champion of the Common Man." He received this title because he was not an inherently wealthy man nor was he part of a family that was consistently in politics. Rather, he came from humble beginnings. This story inspired many American citizens.
2) His policies resulted in increased democracy in the US- Jackson helped to get rid of property qualifications and other restrictions to ensure that white farmers had the right to vote, regardless of how much property they owned.
I’m sorry , i don’t understand
During the late nineteenth century, many anti-imperialists worried that imperialism might threaten United States democratic values by VIOLATING FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS, such as the right to have a government of their own, something that Imperialist countries were known to restrict on their colonies.
Courts of general jurisdiction typically have a judge and jury.
<h3>Further explanation
</h3>
A court of general jurisdiction is a court with authority to hear cases of all kinds for example the criminal, civil, family, probate, etc.
Courts of general jurisdiction typically have a judge and jury. A judge is a public officer who presides over a lower court of law. A judge may be appointed by the executive branch of government through the Attorney General. Judge analyze and interpret all evidence in a court of law regarding cases to dictate a fair verdict and a sentence when necessary. Judge act as impartial mediators in courts of law, taking part in hearings, civil litigation cases, etc.
Many cases begin in this court. Usually, the cases are like felonies, serious misdemeanors, fraud, bankruptcy, and other "white collar crimes". In this courts of general jurisdiction, cases are heard through trial by the jury.
One significant effect of the classification of a court is the liability that a judge from that court might face for stepping beyond the bounds of that court.
Whereas a jury is a group of ordinary individuals who are chosen by a court to hear the evidence presented by the defendant and the plaintiff and a jury gives a verdict on a case
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- Learn more about general jurisdiction brainly.com/question/6995997
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: 9
Subject: history
Chapter: general jurisdiction
Keywords: general jurisdiction
