Answer:
As described on the poem, the car's driver refers the individual who caused him to stop his car as an "old man". Therefore, it is implied the driver is much younger than that individual.
Elderly people are characterized as wise beings, given the broader amount of experience they have gained throughout their lifetime - produced by their longer primacy on Earth. Humans shape their behaviour as they age up, thus, elders think very differently than younger generations. In the case of the poem, the old man holds stronger moral values towards the toads than does the driver - creating a misunderstanding between the characters.
Explanation:
Hello!
I unfortunately cannot answer multiple questions in one answer, but what I can tell you, is the difference between a complete sentence and a fragment taken from one. A complete sentence would be "When Catherine rode her bike to the store, she bought ice cream and cookies."
A fragment is taken from a complete sentence, and it looks like this.
"When Catherine rode her bike to the store."
Hope I helped!
Have a wonderful day! :)
-L
What are the challenges plz tell us
Assignment Nixon’s Argument
President Nixon was trying to convince them that he didn't profit from public service, but he earned every single penny in the argument. He said that he was glad that the people were wondering about this because he wanted them to know if their president was a crook or not. President Nixon didn't convince me. He wasn't entirely focused on his speech. While he was giving his speech, his voice showed that he was nervous or anxious. He also had a tone of anxiety in his voice. Based on his language and nonverbal cues, the audience perceives Nixon as untrustworthy after his speech. Nixon's nonverbal cues indicate annoyed, defensiveness, and anxiety, while his words express innocence. The words used in the text, such as mistakes and "welcome this kind of examination," show that Nixon is saying he is offense. When Nixon said “so that when I, in 1968, decided to become a candidate for President, I decided to clean the decks and to put everything in real estate. I sold all my stock for $300,000—that is all I owned. I sold my apartment in New York for $300,000—I am using rough figures here. And I had $100,000 coming to me from the law firm.” Nixon claims that when he became president, he sold all of his stock ($300,000 worth), sold his New York City apartment (for $300,000), and collected $100,000 in salary from his law firm. If Nixon really was telling the truth he would had showed evidence like- a bill, transaction records, and a paycheck.
No.
All equipment, no matter how much training you might have with similar equipment, should only be used with the proper training. Even though pieces might be similar, there might be some important (and potentially) dangerous differences.
