Identical abilities doesn't equate to equality.
In the story, everybody in the dystopian society was given impairments to 'level the playing field' so to speak. No one person was smarter or faster or different from anybody else. In doing this, it's supposed to be supporting the idea of a more 'fair' society; however, the supposed 'equality' that resulted from this was ultimately the impairment of the broader spectrum of society.
I’m not sure if they are open to any other games but they have to be a better game
Answer:
I think B. rhyming of a poem sorry if i'm wrong
Explanation:
We are to explain what smart cities meant from the author's perspective (point of view)
The correct answer is option D
The statement which best summarizes the author's perspective on smart cities is "Smart cities are most successful when they are developed to benefit the population".
- Smart cities are best when it is developed for the benefit of it's citizens. The major aim of smart cities should be for the benefits of the citizens.
- Smart cities can be said to have been achieved when it is beneficial to people living in it.
- Smart cities should help improve the quality of life citizens.
Read more:
brainly.com/question/23790804
Answer:
Explanation
Explanation:
You didn't provide the original passage but if I had to guess, I'd say C is probably the correct answer.
