1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
14

Leah deposited $50,000 in the bank. Three years later, she borrowed $40,000 for a new truck. From this description, which is the

most accurate statement?
A. Leah is earning more interest than she is paying.
B. Leah did not have to provide collateral.
C. Leah is being charged too much interest.
D. Leah has the character to make payments on the loan.
Business
2 answers:
Anarel [89]3 years ago
5 0
B. leah did not have to provide collateral

Angelina_Jolie [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

As it is given in the question that leah has $50,000 in her bank account and after 3 year she borrowed forty thousand dollar from bank  which mean that she didn't have to provide collateral to borrowed money from bank.

Explanation:

As it is given in the question that leah has $50,000 in her bank account and after 3 year she borrowed forty thousand dollar from bank  which mean that she didn't have to provide collateral to borrowed money from bank.

collateral is that assets that has been put on security to borrowed money from home. But in this case as leah has $50000 in her account for three year and then borrowed $40,000 this mean she didn't need to put any collateral.

You might be interested in
Consider a firm with a 2013 net income of $20 million, revenue of $60 million, and cost of goods sold of $25 million. If the bal
Nostrana [21]

Answer:

Weeks of supply = 4.16 weeks

Explanation:

given data

net income = $20 million

revenue = $60 million

cost of goods sold = $25 million

inventory = $2 million

property, plant, and equipment = $500,000

to find out

how many weeks of supply does the firm hold

solution

we know here that Weeks of supply will be express as

Weeks of supply = \frac{average inventory}{cost of goods sold} × 52 weeks          ....................................1

so put here value we get weeks of supply

Weeks of supply =  \frac{2}{25} × 52 weeks

Weeks of supply = 4.16 weeks

3 0
3 years ago
Tom sells his father's watch for $100 to sue. he later finds out from his father that the watch was an expensive rolex. tom want
Daniel [21]

The court would rule in sue's favor because courts seldom inquire into the adequacy of consideration.

In contracts, <em>consideration </em>just means the <em>exchange of things of value</em>. There has to be an exchange of things of value for there to be an enforceable contract, and in this case a watch was exchanged for money. It is rare for courts to rule on how much consideration is expected because people are generally free to set their own prices and not sell if the price is too low. That is not for a court to decide (in most cases).

8 0
3 years ago
Ahngram Corp. has 1,000 carton of oranges that cost $20 per carton in direct costs and $19.00 per carton in indirect costs and s
andrew11 [14]

Answer:

The incremental income from processing the oranges into orange juice would be =$51000.

Explanation:

Incremental income from further process= (Selling price per unit- Additional cost per unit)*No. of units sold

= ($66 per unit-$15 per unit)*1000 units

= $51000

6 0
3 years ago
Ziegler Inc. has decided to use the high-low method to estimate the total cost and the fixed and variable cost components of the
telo118 [61]

Answer:

a. $175.50 and $11,060,000

b. $31,242,500

Explanation:

The computation of the fixed cost and the variable cost per unit by using high low method is shown below:

Variable cost per units = (High total cost - low total cost) ÷ (High units produced - low units produced)

= ($32,120,000- $25,100,000) ÷ (120,000 units - 80,000 units)

= $7,020,000 ÷ 40,000 units

= $175.50

Now the fixed cost equal to

= High total cost - (High units produced × Variable cost per unit)

= $32,120,000 - (120,000 units × $175.50)

= $32,120,000 - $21,060,000

= $11,060,000

Now the estimated total cost is would be

= Fixed cost + expected units of production × variable cost per unit

= $11,060,000 + 115,000 units × $175.50

= $11,060,000 + $20,182,500

= $31,242,500

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For a certain item, the cost-minimizing order quantity obtained with the basic EOQ model is 200 units, and the total annual inve
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

$2 per unit per year

Explanation:

The calculation of the inventory carrying cost per unit per year is shown below:

Inventory Carrying cost per unit per year is

= Total Annual Inventory cost ÷ Economic order quantity

= $400 ÷ 200 units  

= $2 per unit per year

It is computed By dividing the total annual inventory cost from the economic order quantity, in order to get the inventory carrying cost

Therefore, the first option is correct

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Compared to attending a technical school, completing a four-year college degree allows you to enjoy lower educational costs ente
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following best explains what a forward contract is?
    13·2 answers
  • A multiple-channel queuing system with a Poisson arrival rate and an exponential service time has an average arrival rate of 4 c
    9·1 answer
  • What is the best reason for why someone would want to
    11·1 answer
  • Assume that on September 1, Office Depot had an inventory that included a variety of calculators. The company uses a perpetual i
    12·1 answer
  • Use commercial bank and Federal Reserve Bank balance sheets to demonstrate the immediate effect of each of the following transac
    13·1 answer
  • You are a financial manager in a public corporation. One of your engineers says that they can increase the profit margin on your
    15·1 answer
  • Please help<br> For what do governments use tax revenues?
    11·1 answer
  • Sheffield borrowed $701000 on October 1, 2017 and is required to pay $721000 on March 1, 2018. What amount is the note payable r
    9·1 answer
  • Josiah was managing a factory in India, and had a decision to make. The factory used child labor, which he disapproved of, but h
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!