the correct answer is your third choice.
Answer:-20
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is negative 20 because if you do -20 times 5 you get -100. So you now you are right when you did a check step that worked
Your approach is the ideal approach...
<span>the bone of contention here is the value of T... </span>
<span>it simply depends on the definition given... some people use 360, others use 365... so it depends on which style your class (or book) uses... </span>
Answer:
No, because the reflection of ABC is not congruent to A’B’C’.
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The rule of the reflection across the line y=x is equal to
(x,y) -------> (y,x)
so
A(-6,6) -------> A'(6,-6) ----> is ok
B(-3,3) ------> B'(3,-3) ----> is ok
C(-8,2) ------> C'(8,-2) ----> is not ok ( is not a reflection acros the line y=x)
therefore
The triangles are no t congruent, because the reflection of ABC is not congruent to A’B’C’
You should spend at least 20 minutes on both machines so that way you can burn 150 calories on each machine to get you 300
