1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Misha Larkins [42]
3 years ago
5

What was Grant's new battle strategy?

History
2 answers:
slega [8]3 years ago
8 0
Sherman would push from Chattanooga to Atlanta to the Atlantic Ocean.
Grant would attack Richmond
densk [106]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Sherman would push from Chattanooga to Atlanta to the Atlantic Ocean.

Grant would attack Richmond

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did president kennedy address civil rights
erica [24]

Answer:

In his speech, Kennedy called Americans to recognize civil rights as a moral cause to which all people need to contribute and was "as clear as the American Constitution." He conveyed how the proposed legislation would lead the nation to end discrimination against African-Americans.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which issue did all delegates agree with in the Constitutional Convention? how to count enslaved people for representation the n
Yuri [45]

Answer:

<h2>Hi mate PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST IF MY ANSWER IS CORRECT PLEASE </h2>

Explanation:

The three-fifths compromise was an agreement reached by the state delegates at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. Under the compromise, every enslaved American would be counted as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes.

Origins of the Three-Fifths Compromise

At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, the founders of the United States were in the process of forming a union. Delegates agreed that the representation each state received in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College would be based on population, but the issue of slavery was a sticking point between the South and the North.

It benefitted Southern states to include enslaved people in their population counts, as that calculation would give them more seats in the House of Representatives and thus more political power. Delegates from Northern states, however, objected on the grounds that enslaved people could not vote, own property, or take advantage of the privileges that White men enjoyed. (None of the lawmakers called for the end of slavery, but some of the representatives did express their discomfort with it. George MAS on of VIRG inia called for anti-slave trade laws, and Gouverneur Morris of New York called slavery “a nefarious institution.”)

Ultimately, the delegates who objected to enslavement as an institution ignored their moral QUAL-ms in favor of unifying the states, thus leading to the creation of the three-fifths compromise.

5 0
2 years ago
What was the importance of having neighbors on the frontier?
cluponka [151]

Answer:

Explanation:

The frontier posed many dangers to the pioneers. There were indians, brutal winters, outlaws, and many more. Having neighbors gave the pioneers help if there was a situation that couldn't be handled alone. Neighbors could help each other with workd that needed to be done. Much of the time the nearest town was 50-100 (or more) miles away. When you had neighbors you had friends. You had someone that could ride for help when you couldn't go yourself

Hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Connecticut compromise called the great compromise
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of it's architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to it's population.

Explanation:

I majored in History

3 0
3 years ago
Which best explains how the change by Palestinians from violence to negotiation affected their case for independence?
mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

A) It made the case stronger by showing that Palestinians were willing to live peacefully alongside Israelis.

Explanation:

The Israeli-Palestinian clash is one of the world's longest-running and most controversial conflicts. At its heart, it is a contention between two self-determination movements— the Jewish Zionist task and the Palestinian national project— that make a case for a similar region. In any case, it is thus, a great deal more confounded than that, with apparently every reality and chronicled detail little and extensive contested by the opposite sides and their defenders.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When did the Arizona territory form
    9·1 answer
  • Why was a convention convened at Annapolis in 1786? to discuss Shays’s Rebellion in Massachusetts to discuss the Spanish ban on
    15·1 answer
  • Is it right or wrong for countries to colonize other countries?
    11·2 answers
  • What happens if the House and Senate versions of a bill are different?
    13·2 answers
  • People whose wants are satisfied by using goods and services are
    11·2 answers
  • How did rearmament impact Germany’s economy and politics?
    14·1 answer
  • How did freedom and slavery developed together in colonial American?
    11·1 answer
  • Luther’s idea spread quickly because of
    12·2 answers
  • The first agricultural revolution resulted in the
    12·2 answers
  • Why do you think that nearly as many enslaved
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!