Answer: Thomas’ age is 15
Explanation:
T + 2T = 45
3T = 45
Divide both sides by 3
T = 15
Answer:
The answer is: A) A creative work environment
Explanation:
Creative working environments usually enable employees to spend time creating different products, being unpredictable, testing different ideas, making mistakes, and innovating.
It's not easy for management to create such working environments, specially when innovation is not linear, is unpredictable and may be inefficient sometimes. But at the long run, innovative companies will tend to dominate their markets.
I wouldn't think so. It is a gift card to a store, it isn't straight cash. So No.
Answer:
price of iPhones decreases
Explanation:
A decrease in price increases quantity demanded but does not increase demand.
iPhones and Android phones are substitute goods.
Substitute goods are goods that can be used in place of another good.
An increase in the price of androids increases the cost of androids. So, consumers would increases their demand for iPhones.
Because iPhone is assumed to be a normal good. An increase in the price of iPhones would increase the demand for the good.
Normal goods are goods that are goods whose demand increases when income increases and falls when income falls
Data plans and iPhones are complement goods.
Complementary goods are goods that are consumed togethe
A decrease in the price of data plans would increase the demand for iPhones.
Answer:
The correect answer is b. mitigate her damages.
Explanation:
The duty to mitigate damages, also called the duty of cooperation or obligation for itself, constitutes a limit to the protection of the right of the affected party with the breach in regard to the amount of compensation, which arises after the cause of the damage.
This legal figure imposes on the creditor the duty to take reasonable measures at its disposal to reduce the damage arising from the breach of contract and, correspondingly, abstain of those unreasonable that can increase it. This means that the mitigation duty operates as a disincentive mechanism to the passive or negligent attitudes of the creditor in the face of default, and prompts him to prevent the aggravation of the damage.