Answers are:
<span>Producers supply the exact goods that consumers buy.
Consumers have enough goods, at the given price
</span><span>Producers use their resources efficiently
At the equilibrium price, the quantity bought= quantity sold. Consumers have enough goods at the given price, meaning that there isn't anyone who wants to buy the good at that price but can't, and producers use their resources efficiently.
The whole economy does not waste resources, since this is the market-efficient outcome, and there aren't many shortages or surpluses for the same reason. </span>
Taxes are the money that the government give you to the last of the years for you work all the years
Do you have a question about it?
Answer:
A monopoly is a company that can control the market. For example the government could put a hight import tax on shoes so no one would ship shoes into the countryman this means that the only shoe brand in the country can adjust there prices of their shoes and people would still buy them because there is no other shoe brand. This shows that they have control over the market (Or sitting at at monopoly position)
Answer:
punishment
Explanation:
Basically, the manager is trying to change the behavior of his employee, Chuck. In management and organizational psychology, that is often referred to as the <em>reinforcement theory of motivation</em>.
In this example, the manager uses remuneration punishment in order to alter Chuck's noted behavior pattern.
<u>NOTE </u>- This is not to be confused with <em>negative reinforcement</em>, which is also related to the reinforcement theory. Although the term <em>negative </em>may imply some similarities with punishment, negative reinforcement is a different concept. While punishment is directly weakening the <em>unwanted </em>behavior, negative reinforcement is strengthening a <em>desired </em>behavior, by means of removing an unwanted consequence <u>for the employee</u> when he follows the wanted behavior pattern.
For example, a form of negative reinforcement would be if Chuck knew upfront that his pay would be reduced if he yelled at his customers and he avoided yelling in the first place because of that.
