Arranging the given distances from sea level on the number line, we have;
- The error made by taking Egypt as being further from the sea level is assuming that the sea level is at the beginning (left) of the number line.
<h3>How can the number line be used to find the distance from the sea level?</h3>
The given elevation of the lowest points in the six countries are;
Country. Lowest point elevation (m)
China. →. -154
Egypt →. -133
Azerbaijan → -28
Serbia. →. 35
Israel. → -408
Laos. →. 70
Sorting the above countries from the country with the lowest point below sea level to the country with the highest point above sea level gives;
Israel → -408
China → -154
Egypt → -133
Azerbaijan → -28
Serbia. → 35
Laos. →. 70
On a number line, we have;
Israel < China < Egypt < Azerbaijan < Serbia < Laos
Relative to zero, which is the sea level, points -133 and -154 are located to the left of zero.
However, point -133 > -154, therefore, -154 < -133, the symbol < represents lesser (in this case 'lower') which indicates that China (point -154) is lower or further left from zero which is the sea level than Egypt (point -133).
The error is therefore mistaking the location of the sea level as being at the extreme left of the number line, rather than at the middle.
Learn more about the number line here:
brainly.com/question/4727909
#SPJ1
Thank you! This helped a lot!!! :)
Answer:
385 yards
Step-by-step explanation:
From the information provided we can only assume that the two hits that Tasha performed were in a straight line and in the same direction. Otherwise we would need to know the direction and/or angle of the shots. Assuming they were straight, the shortest minimum distance between the tee area and the hole would be calculated by adding the distance of the two shots.
220 yards + 165 yards = 385 yards
Question: The sample data and the scatter plot was not added to your question. See the attached file for the scatter plot.
Answer: Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
From scatter plot, it was discovered that there is a linear relationship between the two variables and both variables are quantitative.
Therefore, it appropriate to use the correlation coefficient to describe the strength of the relationship between "Time" and "Fish Quality"?
