Answer:
Original cost of the stock = $23.16
Explanation:
Original cost of the stock = Selling price of stock / ( 1 + r )^n
Original cost of the stock = $50 / (1+8%)^10
Original cost of the stock = $50 / (1.08)^10
Original cost of the stock = $23.16
Answer:
$33,500
Explanation:
The Cash Required for Payment to Supplier is The Purchases Price less Credit Allowance and Cash Discount granted since Piedmont Company pays the invoice within the discount period.
If Piedmont Company had paid invoice out of the discount period we would only deduct the Credit Allowance from the Purchase Price.
Cash Required for Payment Calculation :
Purchase Price $45,000
Less Credit Allowance ($7,000)
Less Cash Discount $45,000 x 10% ($4,500)
Cash Required for Payment $33,500
Answer:
Existing Equity = 20 million
Existing debt = 60 million
Total capital = 20 million + 60 million = 80 million
a. Given company issued 30 million of equity to retire debt
Equity after raise = $20 million + $30 million = $50 million
Debt = $60 million - $30 million = $30 million
Total capital size remain at $80 million
Capital structure, Equity = $50 million/$80 million = 0.625 = 62.50%
Debt = (1-0.625) = 0.375 = 37.50%
b. The market would welcome the new issue as the risk of the firm would be reduced.
Answer:
still be liable for Hala's contract.
Explanation:
Any contract entered into by any of the partners, before the dissolution of a partnership business is deemed legal hence binding on the partners. This means that the partners will still be liable for the new contract in line with their partnership status.
Although, before a partnership business can be dissolved, at least one of partners must give a notice of intent. If in the process of giving the notice, another member enters in a new contract, such will be valid and partners will still be held liable because the business has still not been dissolved in the eye of the law.
Any contract entered into by any partner in a partnership business aftet dissution becomes illegal hence not binding on other members.
Answer: <em>customers' lack of money
</em>
Explanation:
Here, in this particular case we can state that the restaurateur Andrew who owns and run a popular contemporary but expensive Chinese restaurant is addressing the fact that customer's lack money. The fact in this particular case is that consumers are willing to pay a modest amounts for the small amount of food being served while in contrast not paying for the "atmosphere" of his restaurant.
