1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Eduardwww [97]
3 years ago
7

Darcy Roofing is faced with a decision. The company relies very heavily on the use of its 60-foot extension lift for work on lar

ge homes and commercial properties. Last year, Darcy Roofing spent $60,000 refurbishing the lift. It has just determined that another $40,000 of repair work is required. Alternatively, it has found a newer used lift that is for sale for $170,000. The company estimates that both lifts would have useful lives of 6 years. The new lift is more efficient and thus would reduce operating expenses by about $20,000 per year. Darcy Roofing could also rent out the new lift for about $10,000 per year. The old lift is not suitable for rental. The old lift could currently be sold for $25,000 if the new lift is purchased.
Prepare an incremental analysis for the life of the machines showing whether the company should replace the equipment.
Business
1 answer:
Verdich [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Effect on income= $15,000 favorable

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

It has just determined that another $40,000 of repair work is required. Alternatively, it has found a newer used lift that is for sale for $170,000. The company estimates that both lifts would have useful lives of 6 years. The new lift is more efficient and thus would reduce operating expenses by about $20,000 per year. Darcy Roofing could also rent out the new lift for about $10,000 per year. The old lift is not suitable for rental. The old lift could currently be sold for $25,000 if the new lift is purchased.

Year 0= -170,000 + 25,000 + 40,000= -105,000

Year 1 trough 6= 20,000*6= 120,000

Effect on income= $15,000 favorable

You might be interested in
7. How does AJ look tyrannical or monarchical with both the tariff/nullification crisis and Indian removal
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:              

Andrew Jackson (AJ for short) was a statesman. He reached the height of this career when he became the 7th President of the United States (POTUS, having served as a soldier and a general in the United States Army). His administration spanned two terms of 4 years each (1829 to 1837)

In direct reference to the question, it can be said that due to his action, he was rather tyrannical than monarchial.

Explanation

On the overall, AJ is regarded by may historians favorably due to his many big wins. Some of those wins which he achieved as POTUS are:

  1. The payment of a long standing national debt
  2. the conclusion of the "most favored nation" treaty with the United Kingdom, which settled claims of damages against France from the Napoleonic Wars,
  3. Prevention of the renewal of the charter of the Second Bank of the United States which was deemed as corrupt established created to enrich the wealthy at the expense of the plebian class and
  4. the recognition Texas as a Republic. It may be worthy of note that he was the first POTUS to have survived an assassination attempt as a sitting president.

Irrespective of the above, his career was marred by two major dents:

  • The endorsement of the of the 1830 Indian Removal Act which forced many Native American tribes in the South to a space that became known as the Indian Territory. The forceful relocation was deemed necessary by the Blue Bloods (White Population) and resulted in mass suffering, mass death by many who where diseased during the forced relocation.
  • The Nullification Crises: For some reason, the congress approved a bill which by itself was designed to fail or be disapproved. It placed a huge tariff (as much as 45%, a historic high) on the Southern Cotton Farmers. The bill became known as the "Tariff of Abominations". He later conceded to several downward revisions of the tariff, first to 27% and further downwards later but not after it had caused a lot of rift between the state of South Carolina and the Federal Government where in the South Carolina had declared the bill unconstitutional. This call out against the Federal Government became known as the Nullification Crises.

Cheers

6 0
3 years ago
Lois has a balance of $970 on a credit card with an APR of 24.2%, compounded monthly. About how much will she save in interest o
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

Lois will save $152.51 when she wil transfer her balance.

Explanation:

Amount to be paid in 1 year for original credit card is given as

P_1^{'}=P*(1+r_1)^t

Here P^{'}_1 is the amount to be paid after P is the balance which is 970, r_1 is the APR for first credit card which is 24.2% and t is compounding frequency which is 12 so

P_1^{'}=P*(1+r_1)^t\\P_1^{'}=970*(1+\dfrac{24.2}{12}\%)^{12}\\P_1^{'}=970*(1.0207)^{12}\\P_1^{'}=970*1.2707\\P_1^{'}=\$1232.61

Similarly for the second one the values are calculated as

P_2^{'}=P*(1+r_2)^t\\P_2^{'}=970*(1+\dfrac{10.8}{12}\%)^{12}\\P_2^{'}=970*(1.108)^{12}\\P_2^{'}=970*1.1135\\P_2^{'}=\$1080.10

The differnce of the two values is calculated as

P_1'-P_2'=1232.61-1080.10\\Difference=\$ 152.51

The difference is $152.51 which she could save.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Determine fixed​ cost, F; average variable​ cost, AVC; average​ cost, AC; marginal​ cost, MC; and average​ fixed-cost, AFC. The
Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

Fixed Cost Function = Average Cost - Average Variable cost

Explanation:

A fixed cost is the one which does not changes with the level of production. These cost are irrelevant to number of units production. It is not affected by the units produced and sold. The change in fixed cost does not affect the marginal cost. The marginal cost is the variable cost that is incurred by producing one more unit. These costs are affected by the level of production.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following actions can NEGATIVELY impact your credit score?
Fudgin [204]
It would be B hope this helps!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A strategic alliance: Group of answer choices A) involves two or more companies joining forces to pursue vertical integration. B
worty [1.4K]

Answer:

B. is an agreement between two or more companies in which there is strategically relevant collaboration of some sort, joint contribution of resources, shared risk, shared control, and mutual dependence

Explanation:

A strategic alliance is an agreement between two or more companies in which there is strategically relevant collaboration of some sort, joint contribution of resources, shared risk, shared control, and mutual dependence

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The S&P 500 Index is one of the most commonly used benchmark indices for the U.S. equity markets. Consisting of 500 companie
    11·1 answer
  • You wish to cite lucent information management, incorporated versus lucent technologies, incorporated. this is a 1997 federal ca
    15·1 answer
  • What is the origin of the term “to post” advertisements?
    15·2 answers
  • Matthew Granger is a member of the board of directors at Produxicore Inc. Over a period of one year, Matthew failed to attend mo
    14·1 answer
  • Pell is the principal and Astor is the agent in an agency coupled with an interest. In the absence of a contractual provision re
    10·1 answer
  • A group of employees in American Game Technology Inc., a manufacturer of gaming machines, got together to arrange a paper recycl
    9·1 answer
  • The production strategy of a firm using a global strategy would likely entail A. A narrow selection of models and styles with ea
    10·1 answer
  • True or false alcohol and drug abuse only affects intoxicated individuals
    6·2 answers
  • 7. The local electronics store is offering a promotion "1-year: same as cash," meaning that you can buy a TV now, and wait a yea
    7·1 answer
  • What is the address bar in Firefox?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!