Before Rosa Parks, A Teenager Defied Segregation On An Alabama Bus. A teenage Claudette Colvin refused to give up her bus seat to a white passenger during the segregation era in Montgomery
Hope this is sort of what you were going for! :)
The destruction of any public property, be it statues or historical buildings, is completely unjustifiable. Not only does destroying these artifacts not benefit anyone, but it hurts countless people. From public workers, who'd have to either rebuild or clean up the destroyed property, to people with connections to the monuments having to deal with the losses, no one is benefited by blatant acts of destruction such as these. And, arguably, not even those who commit them.
Answer:
c. Even distasteful expressions of opinions are protected.
Explanation:
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution presents the citizens with the right to practice any religion they choose and have free speech and expression. In other words, it prevents the government from making any law that orders an individual to follow a certain religion or be stopped from freely expressing their thoughts.
And with this First Amendment, the freedom of expression covers the protection of even distasteful expressions. This is because freedom of expression allows a person to freely express whatever thoughts he believes in, regardless of the issue or causes.
Thus, the correct answer is option c.
