The economic policy that was most successful during the Great Depression is (D) increased government spending. It is a common view among economists that government spending on the war at least accelerated from the recovery of the Great Depression. Well, as always, other think that it didn't play a vital role in recovery.
Answer: Freedom of religion
Explanation: In simple words, religious rights or freedom of religion are the laws protected by the first amendment of the US constitution which secures the position to its citizens for following their religion.
In the given case, Ms William has the right to exercise religion but the company made some hurdles for her to do so.
Hence we can conclude that the rights of freedom of religion has been violated.
Answer:
(A) $500 million
(B) This type of analysis is used to show that Special Interest Groups tend to press the government for TRANSFERS instead of ECONOMIC GROWTH.
Explanation:
1/10,000 of the real GDP is = $50,000
RGDP = 50,000 ÷ 1/10,000
RGDP = 50,000 × 10,000 = $500,000,000
If special interest group Q would have to be indifferent (not care which policy is applied at the given time) between the 2 policies, then the economic growth policy would have to increase the size of the RGDP (the economic pie) by an amount sufficient enough for them to get their net benefit of $50,000.
The RGDP figure above ($500 million) is the amount by which RGDP (real gross domestic product) should grow, if Group Q will still get their net benefit when only the economic growth policy (EGP) is applied.
In this case, the EGP applied in place of the TP (transfer policy) would still fetch Group Q the minimum net benefit of $50,000
(B) This type of analysis is used to show that Special Interest Groups tend to press the government (policy makers and enforcers) for TRANSFERS instead of ECONOMIC GROWTH.
Answer: No, because Mallory and Raghav are not bound by the contract.
Explanation: Being bound by a contract entails being linked to a written agreement, the breaching of which could result in consequences lying with the person who breached the contract. However when this contract was entered into, there was a clause that allowed the parties to cancel the contract at any time. When Mallory fired Raghav the contract was subsequently cancelled, making the contract null and void (non - existent). This means that Raghav is not entitled to the outstanding 10 months' salaries.
