Answer:
Anthony most likely concludes her speech in this manner because she hopes to <em><u>convince the audience that women are entitled to the same rights as men.</u></em>
Explanation:
It can be seen in this passage, Anthony was trying to protect women's right by implying that they are also citizens and their privileges and immunities should not be curtailed by any laws. And in the conclusion, she did also mention the term "discrimination against women" (refers to any actions that refuse opportunities, privileges to a person (or a group) because of gender as female) and express the objection to that to show the advocacy for women's right.
Answer:
14:08
Explanation:Note an important fact from Hank Wisniewski’s answer, which some misguided soul downvoted: the result is not what your teacher presumably wanted. I suspect he wanted you to calculate based on the longitudes (thus the multiples of 15°), and presumably he wanted you to say 16:00.
As Hank says, the longitudes are irrelevant. The Indian time zone (IST) has an offset from UTC of 5½ hours. Japan (JST) has an offset of 9 hours. Neither observe DST. So any part of Japan is always 3½ hours ahead of India, and the correct answer is 15:30.
India can also be at 97° E, and Japan can also be at 129° E. That makes no difference to the time in either place, but the simplistic longitude calculation would give you a time of 14:08 in this case
Terrorism is the use of violence to strike fear into people and attain political goals.
The true statement about terrorism is:
This tactic has been used throughout history to draw attention to causes.
Answer:
A.Relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch.
Explanation:
These are options for the question
A.Relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch.
B.Relevant, but only if the prosecution can prove that Charles Rogers and not his brother was the actual owner of the blowtorch.
C.Irrelevant, assuming the defendant can prove to the court in an offer of proof that his brother does in fact use the blowtorch for professional purposes.
D.Irrelevant, since it is not information that a person would want to know in deciding whether the defendant committed the crime.
From the question we are informed Charles Rogers who was accused of robbing a bank by breaking into the bank's vault after hours. The prosecution seeks to introduce evidence that a blowtorch was found in his garage. The defendant objects, pointing out that Rogers' brother, who shares the home with Rogers, is a professional pipe-fitter and uses the blowtorch every day for legitimate work. In this case The evidence is relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch. In a crime scene which is regarded as location that is been associated to the crime committed. In this scene physical evidence should be able to be provided so that investigation and persecution of those involving in the crime can be relevant and it will be easier for investigators as well as law enforcement
