Answer:
The percentage loss will be "-9.08%". The further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
The given values are:
Invested amount
= 20,000
Price of purchase
= $66
Total number of shares
= 500
The borrowed amount will be:
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/677ce/677ce4c5dfd345f7d730ee964ef65f253e8477f6" alt="(500\times 66)-20000"
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/900c5/900c51eb1ecf1c9c29b728573ceb0a23451a67f4" alt="13,000"
When the price increase to 69.63, the gain will be:
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c795f/c795f74fc95445f3d5e5bd3b5d9aa39d6598bb27" alt="69.63-66"
=
($)
The total gain will be:
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0181/a01812bcd9a7f881da806cccfbeb12c6da8074ed" alt="3.63\times 500"
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40809/408091789f9e0e8c3ab78ad84368a0fcb48085bf" alt="1815"
Increase in percentage will be:
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66915/66915d5bdac81476639a4d2f02396c08513cfa7f" alt="\frac{1815}{20,000}\times 100"
=
%
Whereas if price stays quite well at $66, there is really no increase, so the percentage growth would be 0%.
If the price declines toward a loss of 62,37 per share:
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb0c4/fb0c4bfa43b778b7b391cb12ff21d786115daa26" alt="62.37-66"
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1a5a/e1a5a0ce9f89a86c3040addab5064be8585ac981" alt="-3.63"
Now,
The total loss will be:
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427fe/427fec940451118ece82b93dd96edb170077b3bf" alt="-3.63\times 500"
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f4e5/0f4e543063a5ad77dd4d233e8ca8bea5cd0a78ca" alt="-1815"
The percentage loss will be:
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56e3f/56e3f53c84ef3bd9397d8743a42bc484a142756c" alt="\frac{-1815}{15,000}"
=
(%)
Answer:
B. $497,000
Explanation:
Consolidated Balance of Equipment
Excess value at the acquisition $110,000
($350,000-$240000)
Book value as on Dec 31 2018 of Ford $170,000
Book value as on Dec 31 2018 of Regent $250,000
Less: excess depreciation <u>-$33,000 </u> ($110,000/10*3)
Consolidated balance of equipment <u>$497,000</u>
Answer:
Poorly designed materials storage and packaging lines. Long packaging process times. Paying for box dimensions rather than product dimensions. Ineffective packaging materials that allow damage. Inefficient manufacturing models. Failing to optimize packaging.
Answer:
Boston
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that A similar concentration has appeared around the city of Boston in the eastern United States of America. Similar to how "Silicon Valley" started, Boston has seen a drastic increase in Startup companies setting up shop in their city. This large amount of startups has attracted a lot of tech savy individuals to Boston and has created a similar environment to Silicon Valley.
A company issued 115 shares of $100 par value
<span> Common stock value
= $12,500 </span>
Total
amount of paid-in capital = ?
Multiply
the shares with amount par value =
Amount of shares = 115 x 100 = $11,500
Total amount of paid-in capital = common stock
value - total amount of shares = $12,500 - $11,500
= $1000
So, total amount paid in capital is $1000.