Answer:
ask your teacher now a little guinea yeah don't let me speak Igbo for you I'm a old boy Emilio boy I don't joke HobbyKidsTV
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Answer:
It is only 2/3
Explanation:
because 2/3 is the same as a majority that means that 2/3 is grater that 12 so it is a majority vote
Answer:
Constitutional monarchy is a country ruled by a
Explanation:
single person or a few people.
Answer:
A. effects being good or bad emotional impact
Explanation:
Conflicts are a natural phenomenon present in people’s lives; there are various perceptions regarding conflicts, however the contemporary perspective is that conflict can be identified as its effects being good or bad emotional impact, could invoke negative feelings; moreover, according to the scholar Afzalur Rahim, whether the effect of conflict is good or bad depends on the strategies used to deal with it.
Furthermore, Task conflict relates to the content and goals of the work; and relationship conflict, focuses on interpersonal relationships.