Answer:
$4,800 each
Explanation:
The computation of the depreciation expense for the first two year under the straight-line method is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
= ($120,000 - $0) ÷ (25 years)
= ($120,000) ÷ (25 years)
= $4,800
In this method, the depreciation is same for all the remaining useful life
Hence, the depreciation of $4,800 is to be charged separately for each year
Answer:
greater; higher than
Explanation:
Here is the complete question
If the supply of aisle seats equals the supply of middle seats on an airplane, and the demand for aisle seats is _____________ than the demand for middle seats, then the equilibrium price of aisle seats will be ______________ the equilibrium price of middle seats
.a. greater; higher than
b. less; higher than
c. greater; lower than
d. less; the same as
Equilibrium price is the price at which quantity demand equal quantity supplied. Above equilibrium price there is a surplus - quantity supplied exceeds quantity demanded.
Below equilibrium price there is a shortage - quantity demanded exceeds quantity supplied
If the demand for aisle seats exceeds the demand for middle seats, it means that equilibrium price for aisle seat would exceed equilibrium price
It’s secure and liquid. Hopes this helps!!!!!
Answer:
Economist A
Government spending multiplier $4billion
Tax multiplier $8billion
Economist B
Government spending multiplier $8billion
Tax multiplier $2billion
Explanation:
Computation for the amount the government would have to increase spending to close the output gap according to each economist's belief
ECONOMIST A
Government spending multiplier=16/4
Government spending multiplier=$4billion
Tax multiplier=16/2
Tax multiplier=$8billion
ECONOMIST B
Government spending multiplier=16/2
Government spending multiplier=$8billion
Tax multiplier=16/8
Tax multiplier=$2billion
Therefore the amount the government would have to increase spending to close the output gap according to each economist's belief are :
ECONOMIST A
Government spending multiplier=$4billion
Tax multiplier=$8billion
ECONOMIST B
Government spending multiplier=$8billion
Tax multiplier=$2billion
Answer:
1. Per se application - US Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of US competition law
2. Misuse of activity - EU Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of EU competition law
3. Extraterritoriality - US and EU
Justification: It is a provision of US and EU antitrust and competition law
4. Trade obstacle, non-tariff - France
Justification: These are considered to be part of the France trade system
5. Strict liability - U.S. Tort Law
Justification: It is part of the U.S. Tort Law and depends on intent to harm liability
6. Punitive damages - U.S. Product Liability Law
Justification: It is a provision of U.S. Product Liability Law
