Answer:
Yes, they were correct demanding the anti-federalist bill or right because "they want to safeguard the liberty"
Explanation:
There are many anti federalist who preferred to have weak central government as they wanted a strong government having British tyranny. Others thought that strong government with the British tyranny will be dominated by wealth so they wanted democracy. According to them the states are giving more power to the new federal government. Anti federalist believed that strong government would threatened the sovereignty and the prestige of the state, localities or he individuals.
Answer:
E & C. True, True, False, True
Explanation:
Answer:
<h2>
C) the fall of communist states in Europe</h2>
Explanation:
<h2>
The year 1989 was a tumultuous one around the world, and it say the fall of Communist states in Europe. While not all were gone by the end of the year, Poland, East Germany, Romania, Bulgaria, and Czechoslovakia all were the site of challenges to Communist authority. These events were not lost on many Chinese, who also desired democratic and capitalistic changes. These desires eventually led to what became known as the Tiananmen Square Protests, and eventually led to the massacre of countless protestors at the hands of the Chinese military.</h2>
<h2><em>Let me know if it is correct or not</em></h2>
Explanation:
It will help them to choose the choices that are better and avoid the negative works thay may be dangerous. 2. It may also help them to avoid the works that may affect their lives or that may ruin their lives.
1. In law, the exclusionary rule is is rule which prevents evidence collected in violation of the defendant's rights from being used against them in the court.
- The Supreme court continues to refine the exclusionary rule because plaintiff now get off on small details against the defendant.
- Although if officers act in good faith in gathering of evidence, the evidence would be seen as legal and admissible in the court.
2. Supreme Court interpreted the Constitution in abortion cases by saying that the woman's decision to have an abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy fell under the right of privacy and therefore, protected by the Constitution
Read more about exclusionary rule
<em>brainly.com/question/1916493</em>
