Based on the question above, I have provided the missing
information to completely answer the question.
The correct answer is that the events “male” and “bet on professional sports”
are not mutually exclusive, so it is a no. The reason to this is because a
person can exist as both male and bet on the professional sports. The correct
answer is letter c.
The correct answer would be option A, Drive Reduction Theory.
Drive Reduction Theory can be used to explain why Lara is motivated to get a drink.
Explanation:
Drive Reduction Theory was given by Mr. Clark Hull in the year 1943. He was a famous American Psychologist. His Theory of Drive Reduction is considered a motivational Theory. According to the theory, the motivation in a person originates because of the biological needs or drives of the body.
Same like in the given example, Lara was thirsty, and she realized that she has not had anything to drink all morning. She saw her friends drinking large soda glasses and there her desire to drink the large soda bottle originates. So here her biological need of thirst motivates her to buy a soda can for herself. So the theory of Drive Reduction best explains Lara's behavior.
Learn more about Drive Reduction Theory at:
brainly.com/question/1228789
brainly.com/question/12071846
#LearnWithBrainly
In 1980<span>, the American Psychiatric Association added PTSD to the third edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders nosologic classification scheme. </span>
the correct answer is :district attorney
According to Merton's typology of prejudice and discrimination, Xavier is an unprejudiced nondiscriminator, whereas Reuben is a prejudiced nondiscriminator.
<h3>Unprejudiced vs. Prejudiced</h3>
Xavier and Reuben cannot be accused of discrimination of African Americans since they both accept them in their chess club. However, there is a big difference between Xavier and Reuben, even if their behavior is the same.
Xavier truly believes African Americans are as intelligent as white Americans, which means he is unprejudiced. Reuben, on the other hand, does not hold the same belief. He is prejudiced against African Americans, thinking they have weak cognitive abilities.
Therefore, even though both can be considered nondiscriminators, Xavier is unprejudiced, whereas Reuben is prejudiced.
Learn more about nondiscriminators here:
brainly.com/question/13782165
#SPJ12
