Answer:
foreign direct investment (FDI) is an investment made by a firm or individual in one country into business interests located in another country. ... However, FDIs are distinguished from portfolio investments in which an investor merely purchases equities of foreign-based companies
Answer: Performance-Reward
Explanation:
Jamie's dissatisfaction with her job arises from the lack of performance-reward relationship in her place of work, this is because position she merited based on her high performance was given to another individual unfairly. Performance-reward relationship is when an employee expects a certain type of reward for outstanding performance on their(the employee's) part.
Answer:
measures the value that a buyer places on a good.
Explanation:
A product can be defined as any physical object or material that typically satisfy and meets the demands, needs or wants of customers. Some examples of a product are mobile phones, television, microphone, microwave oven, bread, pencil, freezer, beverages, soft drinks, etc.
Willingness to pay measures the value that a buyer places on a good or product. Thus, when this value is high, the customer would ultimately buy a product and vice-versa.
Answer:
Both steps give candidates a realistic preview of the job.
Explanation:
When a manager from another restaurant says to you, "I’ve heard that Barcelona has a three-step hiring process. Candidates first have an interview in which Scott does most of the talking, and then they visit Barcelona restaurants and record their impressions. This seems like a lot of work. The basic purpose and logic behind these two steps is to give candidates a realistic preview of the job. With the help of these two steps in which candidates first have an interview with Scott and then visit Barcelona restaurants to get their impressions recorded, candidates can have a realistic, practical and genuine preview of the job. Candidates can come to know about the expectations which they can have from the job and the reality so they will not be surprised and shocked at all if their expectations does not meet the actual job's conditions and specifications.
Answer:
The answer is D, the reporter is liable for a claim of libel
Explanation:
First of, we need to understand that libel in it self refers to a false statement or report published against an individual and of which the report has a very high tendency of tarnishing the individuals image. In order words, it can also be refereed to as the defamation of character where the victim in this case is refereed to as the character.
So, referring back to the question. As a reporter, it is assumed that proper diligence has been done in respect to investigation or investigative journalism as some like to call it before going before the public to declare such a defaming statement and in such a case where such sequentially, the statement comes to be a false statement, the reporter and in some cases the firm at large is liable for a claim of libel.
So as related to the question asked, the answer is D.
