Answer:
Data Stories The Least Dangerous Branch? Alexander Hamilton once described the judiciary as the least dangerous branch of government, since it controlled no armies and lacked spending power. This has inspired constitutional designers to try to empower independent courts to check other branches
Explanation:
thank me later
For the case of Japan, in 1868 new government of Japan underway
after Shogun decided to reestablish prerogatives of the Emperor's removal in
peace. Political style had altered from the shogunate to constitutional empire,
which constitution was founded on German's Staatsrecht those days. Japan
was reorganized and swayed by western society and culture but Japanese
government didn't follow as same. Instead Japan adapt and select some parts of
them only very suitable for them. Japan tried to draw near with West and
USA. They completed a lot of allocation to get worldwide rational, knowledge
and education for evading from the closed society (national isolation) in the
world.
For the case of the US, Twain and Warner were not erroneous
about the era’s exploitation, but the years between 1877 and 1900 were likewise
some of the utmost significant and active in American history. They set in signal
advances that would mold the country for generations like the reunification of
the South and North, the incorporation of four million anew unbound African
Americans, westward growth, immigration, industrialization, and urbanization.
The correct option is this: TROOPS WERE BASICALLY TRAPPED IN THEIR TRENCHES, PREVENTING PROGRESS TOWARD SEIZING ENEMY TERRITORY.
A trench refers to a long and deep ditch, big enough to accommodate humans. Trenches were used by soldiers during the World War 1. Soldiers faced a lot of difficulties living in these trenches, and it become a disadvantage to German and the other allied power, because the trenches hindered their progress towards seizing their enemies' territories.<span />
<em>I think the answer is</em> instituting universal military mobilization
<em>I hope this helps </em>
No because they worked tirelessly and got little in return other than the safety of the manor, instead the manor’s lord got most of the riches and lived comfortably
