<span>A typical married couple would probably be a. Gilbert would be for splitting the household chores on the basis of time spent on each task. However, it is a bit unusual to actually calculate the time it takes for each task. B. and c. doesn't make sense. D. is also valid, however.</span>
Answer:
B) $5,000
Explanation:
Bob and Sally can claim an American Opportunity (AO) credit for both of their children, Del and Owen.
Del's AO credit is $2,500 (100% of the initial $2,000 qualifying expenses and 25% of the next $2,000 qualifying expenses).
Owen's AO credit is the same as Del's, $2,500.
The total American Opportunity credit claimed is $5,000 ($2,500 + $2,500)
The management function that Shonda is performing when she decides that top managers will report to her while everyone else reports to the head of human resources is <u>iii. organizing.</u>
<h3>What is Organizing in management functions?</h3>
Organizing is that function of management involving the development an organizational structure so that human resources are arranged for the achievement of organizational objectives. Organizing also involves the design of the jobs of individuals.
Thus, the management function Shondra performs here is <u>Option III</u>.
Learn more about management functions at brainly.com/question/17083312
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": There could be supplier interruptions due to political instability.
Explanation:
Single sourcing refers to a company deciding to choose one particular supplier -even if there are many options from where to select- because of a specific reason. The greater disadvantage of this situation is relying on one supplier for the manufacturing process which at a certain point could bring <em>instability </em>in front of different issues inherent or not to the supplier.
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.
