Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": a result of more efficient resource allocation than would be observed in the absence of trade.
Explanation:
Trade has allowed societies to exchange their products according to their needs. Thanks to trade those goods are distributed accordingly more <em>efficiently </em>since, in isolation, countries would be specialists of certain types of products only which is unlikely to be enough to cover all the individuals' needs in those societies.
Answer:
Principal resources are reported as a line-item within the management wide declaration of net situation. Non-depreciable principal resources are individually reported within the proceedings to the money declarations. The revealing expressions starting equilibriums, will increase and reduces, and finish stabilities for every main category of principal assets, yet because the same info for accrued devaluation for every key category. These revelations are given individually for the wealth assets of administrative actions, occupational sort actions, and unnoticeably given part units. The summaries stipulate capitalization inceptions for all principal assets, together with arrangement. The summaries display the quantities of devaluation expenditure assigned to every major operate or package for administrative actions at the government-wide flat. The decline strategies and calculable lives of main categories of depreciable resources are released. Summaries do reveal the strategies relating to capitalization of assortment of skills and historic materials if some. These collectibles aren't criticized however market price of those art effort is measured to reason gain/ injury at the year finish. Accounting strategies for possessions no inheritable underneath capita tenancy are obviously mere
A) 2,679.45
B) 50,909.55
C) 1,071,780
Explanation:
The bank will keep 5% of the deposit:
53,589 x 5% = 2,679.45
Then, it will have in excess the remainder:
53,589 - 2,679.45 = 50,909.55
This amount can be used for another.
This makes a hypothetical loop. The borrower can also deposit and creating the chance or another loan and so on. The cycle repeats indefinitely
The maximum amount of new money can be determinate as follow:
53,589 / 0.05 = 1,071,780
There are several elements that need to be covered when conducting a formal marketing/ sales event except A. providing a list of plans that have the same star rating.
<h3>How can you be compliant when conducting a formal marketing/sales event?</h3>
It is important that several different plans are offered because consumers have different types of needs.
A complete plan presentation should also be provided to ensure that consumers know what they are getting into.
You do not however have to provide plans that have the same star ratings as the plan being presented on.
Options for this question include:
A. providing a list of plans that have the same star rating.
B. providing a complete plan presentation.
C. providing different plans
Find out more on formal sales events at brainly.com/question/24370156.
#SPJ1
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
