Google: “The right to travel is part of the Liberty of which a citizen cannot deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.” So try the 5th!
People began breaking away from the Catholic Church, and the Pope was doing everything he could to keep the Catholic Church in control. During this period, many people were killed as a result of religious wars. This is how Protestantism affected the Catholic Church and the rest of Europe.
Charlemagne (/ˈʃɑːrləmeɪn/) or Charles the Great[a] (German: Karl der Große, Italian: Carlo Magno/Carlomagno; 2 April 742[1][b] – 28 January 814), numbered Charles I, was King of the Franks from 768, King of the Lombards from 774, and Holy Roman Emperor from 800. He united much of western and central Europe during the Early Middle Ages. He was the first recognised emperor to rule from western Europe since the fall of the Western Roman Empire three centuries earlier.[2] The expanded Frankish state that Charlemagne founded is called the Carolingian Empire. He was later canonized by Antipope Paschal III.
Charlemagne
A denarius of Charlemagne dated c. 812–814 with the inscription KAROLVS IMP AVG(Karolus Imperator Augustus) (in Latin)
Holy Roman EmperorReign25 December 800 – 28 January 814Coronation25 December 800
Old St. Peter's Basilica, RomePredecessorMonarchy establishedSuccessorLouis the PiousKing of the LombardsReign10 July 774 – 28 January 814Coronation10 July 774
PaviaPredecessorDesideriusSuccessorBernard of ItalyKing of the FranksReign9 October 768 – 28 January 814Coronation9 October 768
NoyonPredecessorPepin the ShortSuccessorLouis the Pious
Born2 April 742[1]
Frankish KingdomDied28 January 814 (aged 71)
Aachen, Francia (present-day Germany)BurialAachen CathedralSpouse
Desiderata
(m. c. 770; annulled 771)
Hildegard of Vinzgouw
(m. 771; d. 783)
Fastrada
(m. c. 783; d. 794)
Luitgard
(m. c. 794; d. 800)
Issue
Among others
Pepin the Hunchback
Charles the Younger
Pepin of Italy
Louis the Pious
DynastyCarolingianFatherPepin the ShortMotherBertrada of LaonReligionRoman CatholicismSignum manus
Charlemagne was the eldest son of Pepin the Short and Bertrada of Laon, born before their canonical marriage.[3] He became king in 768 following his father's death, initially as co-ruler with his brother Carloman I. Carloman's sudden death in December 771 under unexplained circumstances left Charlemagne as the sole ruler of the Frankish Kingdom.[4] He continued his father's policy towards the papacy and became its protector, removing the Lombards from power in northern Italy and leading an incursion into Muslim Spain. He campaigned against the Saxons to his east, Christianizing them upon penalty of death and leading to events such as the Massacre of Verden. He reached the height of his power in 800 when he was crowned "Emperor of the Romans" by Pope Leo III on Christmas Day at Rome's Old St. Peter's Basilica.
Answer:
If I were an elected German official, I would be outraged by the agreement. My response would be to demand a voice in the ratification of the agreement, in which I can guarantee the stability of my country's economy and global image.
Explanation:
As someone who was too young at the time to fully appreciate the complexities of the political process at the time, I never understood why the Equal Rights Amendment was never passed. On the one hand, it seems a no-brainer, a basic statement of obvious human rights. However, trying to research online the reasons why it wasn't passed produces a whole bunch of feminist fruitcakery, including some who insist the amendment technically passed and is in effect. The original support for the amendment was among conservative women, while labor unions and "New Deal" types virulently opposed it an exact flip flop of the typical cliches and stereotypes of the political left and right.
My idle speculation is that the trouble stems from the second clause of the amendment as proposed: "The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." That seems, in an era when people are arguing the constitutionality of mandating health insurance coverage, a loophole big enough through which to ram all sorts of trouble.