1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natita [175]
4 years ago
14

What is the equation of the line shown in this graph? A function graph of a line with two points (-4,1) and (2,1) with an x axis

of negative five to five and a y axis of negative five to five Enter your answer in the box.

Mathematics
1 answer:
alisha [4.7K]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

  y = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

You should be able to tell by inspection that the line is horizontal at y = 1.

You might be interested in
Where is the red dot located?
Juliette [100K]

Answer:

(0,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

For the x coordinate it is at 0 and for the y it is also at 0.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A line goes through the points (-4,6) and (-2,3). A line perpendicular to<br> that line is:
gulaghasi [49]

Answer: A line with a slope of 2

Step-by-step explanation: the slope of the line is -1/2 so the negative reciprcal of the slope is 2 (It would be perpendicular to it)

i used m=y2-y2/x2-x1 to figure ou the slope and -(x/y) as the negative reciprcal for the perpendicular line.

5 0
3 years ago
Find the scale factor.
sveticcg [70]

Answer:

the scale factor is times 0.5

Explanation:

20 plus 10 is 30. Half of 20 is 10 so that is 0.5

It is also like that for the others

3 0
3 years ago
The Salk polio vaccine experiment in 1954 focused on the effectiveness of the vaccine in combating paralytic polio. Because it w
sdas [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The variables of interest are:

X₁: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the placebo vaccine.

n₁= 201299 total children studied

x₁= 110 cases observed

X₂: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the experimental vaccine.

n₂= 200745 total children studied

x₂= 33 cases observed

These two variables have a binomial distribution. The parameters of interest, the ones to compare, are the population proportions: p₁ vs p₂

You have to test if the population proportions of children who contracted polio in both groups are different: p₂ ≠ p₁

a)

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.05

Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }

Sample proportion placebo p'₁= x₁/n₁= 110/201299= 0.0005

Sample proportion vaccine p'₂= x₂/n₂= 33/200745= 0.0002

Pooled sample proportion p'= (x₁+x₂)/(n₁+n₂)= (110+33)/(201299+200745)= 0.0004

Z_{H_0}= \frac{(0.0002-0.0005)-0}{\sqrt{0.0004[\frac{1}{201299} +\frac{1}{200745} ]} }= -4.76

This test is two-tailed, using the critical value approach, you have to determine two critical values:

Z_{\alpha/2}= Z_{0.025}= -1.96

Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.975}= 1.96

Then if Z_{H_0} ≤ -1.96 or if Z_{H_0} ≥ 1.96, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -1.96 < Z_{H_0} < 1.96, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ Z_{H_0}= -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

b)

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.01

Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }

The value of Z_{H_0}= -4.76 doesn't change, since we are working with the same samples.

The only thing that changes alongside with the level of significance is the rejection region:

Z_{\alpha /2}= Z_{0.005}= -2.576

Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.995}= 2.576

Then if Z_{H_0} ≤ -2.576or if Z_{H_0} ≥ 2.576, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -2.576< Z_{H_0} < 2.576, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ Z_{H_0}= -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

c)

Remember the level of significance (probability of committing type I error) is the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis. This means that the smaller this value is, the fewer chances you have of discarding the true null hypothesis. But as you know, you cannot just reduce this value to zero because, the smaller α is, the bigger β (probability of committing type II error) becomes.

Rejecting the null hypothesis using different values of α means that there is a high chance that you reached a correct decision (rejecting a false null hypothesis)

I hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
You are given an unfair (trick) six-sided die where the probabilities of rolling a 1 or 2 are each ¼, the probabilities of rolli
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

kkk bdushcbududjrifjf

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which binomial is a factor of c2−12c+32?
    5·1 answer
  • Calculate gcd(77, 30) by using the Euclidean algorithm. Find also integers u and v such that 49u + 30v = 1. Furthermore, find su
    13·1 answer
  • Solve the equation. -4 +x = -19
    10·1 answer
  • Rewrite the following in the form log (c). 4 log(5)
    15·1 answer
  • What is 38.72 divided by 1.1?
    14·2 answers
  • Calculate 650mL into ounces show work
    15·1 answer
  • Convert 89.25 cm = km ​
    14·1 answer
  • Mathematics pls help me.
    10·1 answer
  • Dana's pool table is 4 feet wide and 8 feet long. Dana wants to replace the felt on the pool
    14·1 answer
  • In AKLM, the measure of ZM=90°, ML = 8, LK = 17, and KM
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!