Answer:
144 in²
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the area of the larger square, then subtract the area of the square we cut out.
The larger square has side length of 15, so it has an area of 15² = 225 in²
The smaller square has side length of 9, so it has an area of 9² = 81 in²
The area left over is
225 - 81 = 144 in²
Answer:
of a gallon per bottle
Step-by-step explanation:
1 -
= 
/ 3 =
x
= 
Solve this as you would an equation that does not involve trig. Don't let the trig scare you. If you had to solve 2x+8=0, the first thing you would do is factor out the common 2. In our equation, we have a common cos theta. I'm going to use beta as my angle. When we factor out beta, here's what we have.

. The Zero Product Property tells us that at least one of those factors has to equal zero. So we set them both equal to zero and solve. Let's get the equations first, then we will need our unit circle. First equation set to equal zero is

. On our unit circle, cos is the value inside the parenthesis that is in the x position within our coordinate. Look at all those coordinates as you go around the unit circle once (once around is equivalent to 2pi). You will find that the the cos is 0 at

. The next equation is

. Move the 1 over by subtraction and divide by 2 to get

. Same as before, go around the unit circle one time and look to see where the coordinate in the y place is -1/2. Sin corresponds to the y coordinate. You will find that sin is -1/2 at

. And there you go! Trig is so much fun!!!
A compound event, I believe
Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that :
Mean (m) = 72
Standard deviation (sd) = 10
Grading cutoff policy:
bottom 5% receive F
next 15% receive D
next 35% receive C
next 30% receive B
A) Give the cutoffs for the grades in this course in terms of standardized scores.
Standardized score for grade cutoff:
Locating the Zscore for the proportions on the z table :
Bottom 5% = 0.05 ; corresponding Zscore = - 1.645
next 15% receive D = (5 +15)% 0.20 ; corresponding Zscore = - 0.84
next 35% receive C = (20+35)% = 0.55 ; corresponding Zscore = 0.13
next 30% receive B = (55 + 30)% = 0.85 ; Corresponding Zscore = 1.04
B) Give the cutoffs in terms of actual total scores.
Recall:
Zscore = (x - m) /sd ; where x = actual score
x = sd*z + m
For F:
10*(-1.645) + 72 = 55.55
For D:
10*(-0.84) + 72 = 63.6
For C:
10*(0.13) + 72 = 73.3
For B:
10*(1.04) + 72 = 82.4
C) Do you think that this method of assigning grades is a good one?
Yes, it is good in terms of expressing scores around the mean such that score below are negative and those above are positive. However, it is a little bit ambiguous.