this question seems to be missing some key information.
Corporations are often accused of despoiling the environment in their quest for profit. Free enterprise is supposedly incompatible with environmental preservation so that government regulation is required.
Such thinking is the basis for current proposals to expand environmental regulation greatly. So many new controls have been proposed and enacted that the late economic journalist Warren Brookes once forecast that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could well become "the most powerful government agency on earth, involved in massive levels of economic, social, scientific, and political spending and interference.
But if the profit motive is the primary cause of pollution, one would not expect to find much pollution in socialist countries, such as the former Soviet Union, China, and in the former Communist countries of Eastern and Central Europe. That is, in theory. In reality, exactly the opposite is true: The socialist world suffers from the worst pollution on earth. Could it be that free enterprise is not so incompatible with environmental protection after all?
It could be argued that the whites became more accepting of tehe civil rights of blacks because the government gave them little choice.
<h3>What was the civil rights movement in the US?</h3>
This was the time that prominent blacks took to call for a better treatment of the Black people in the United States.
The way that this happened was through demonstrations and civil disobedience. After segregation became outlawed by the governemnt, the white people had to follow governemnt rules.
Read more on segregation here:brainly.com/question/12498653
Answer:
A)Land prices are falling
Explanation:
Answer: The probe won’t display a reading because the skull is too old. There isn’t enough carbon-14 remaining to accurately assess its age.
Explanation: change it up a bit though.
