1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
djverab [1.8K]
3 years ago
10

Which of the nation of Islam’s of beliefs did Malcom X reject later in life ?

History
1 answer:
slava [35]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The separation of the races was the only way to achieve a free society.

Explanation:

According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:

  • All people should be free to worship as they please.
  • The separation of the races was the only way to achieve a free society.
  • Islam was a religion of oppression.

Malcolm X was a social leader and human rights activist who gained notoriety during the civil rights movement in the United States. Malcolm X is also remembered for having been part of the Nation of Islam, a group that advocated black supremacy, black empowerment, and the separation of black and white Americans. This went against the ideas of the civil rights movement which encouraged nonviolence and racial integration. However, later in life, Malcolm X publicly renounced the Nation of Islam, including its ideas on the separation of races.

You might be interested in
What most accurately describes imperial holdings in 1900
sertanlavr [38]

this is from Spark Notes 1870-1900. Great Britain held the most countries I think.

Europe's scramble for Africa did not leave South and East Asia at peace. Beginning in the seventeenth century, Great Britain formed and maintained an economic relationship with India. By the end of the eighteenth century, British rule of India was firmly planted and London came to view India as the jewel of its empire. This view guided its foreign policy. For decades, Britain used its military victories and naval superiority to ensure uninterrupted routes to India and beyond, hence its island holdings in the Mediterranean, along the west African coast, at the southern tip of Africa, and, most importantly, the Suez Canal. By the end of the eighteenth century, Indo-British economic ties were so entrenched in a neo-mercantile system that India provided a stepping stone for British trade with China. Britain traded English wool and Indian cotton for Chinese tea and textiles; however, as Chinese demand slackened, Britain sought other means of attracting trade with China.

By the 1830s, Britain realized it could make up the trade deficit with China by selling Indian opium into the Chinese market, making opium Britain's most profitable and important crop in world markets. Eventually, opium poured into China faster than tea poured into British hands; soon, Chinese merchants, already addicted themselves and buying for an addicted population, paid British opium traders in pure silver.

Concerned with the sharp rise in opium addiction and the associated social costs and rise in criminal acts, the Chinese government, led by the aging Manchu dynasty, took action against the British. In 1839, the Chinese destroyed British opium in the port city of Canton, sparking the Opium Wars of 1839- 1842. Easily dominating the backward Chinese forces, the British expeditionary force blockaded Chinese ports, occupied Shanghai, and took complete control of Canton. The 1842 Treaty of Nanking granted Britain extensive trading and commercial rights in China, marking the first in a series of unequal treaties between China and European imperial powers. By the end of the century, after five wars between China and various European powers, France, Britain, Germany, Japan, and Russia held territorial and commercial advantages in their respective spheres of influence. These spheres of influence comprised territories, ports, shipping lines, rivers, et cetera in which one nation held exclusive rights to profits and investment. 

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
T/F: After world war II, most of America experienced prosperity including a majority of minorities.
8090 [49]

Answer:

<h2>False</h2><h3>Yes, there was great prosperity following World War II, but for the most part minorities were left out of that prosperity.</h3>

Explanation:

There was a post-war economic boom in the United States after World War II.  There was also significant population growth, which caused an expansion of cities into suburbs.  The prices of homes in suburbs were more affordable to middle class families, due to lower land prices and new building practices like tract housing. With the growth of the suburbs, improvement of roadways became a priority.  Highway improvement was also a priority of President Eisenhower for the sake of national security.   The Federal-Aid Highway Act passed in 1956 allocated $26 billion (in 1956 dollars!) to a monumental road-building effort that created the interstate highway system.  

The growth of the suburbs had a negative counter-effect, however. Suburban culture had the tendency to segregate white Americans in the suburbs from blacks in the cities' inner core neighborhoods, leading to racial segregation and inner city poverty issues that we're still dealing with today.

8 0
3 years ago
Many people didn't agree with the constitution and would not sign it until the Bill of
exis [7]
Because it guaranteed people their freedoms
5 0
3 years ago
what problems caused the government to create the interstate commerce comission and the sherman antitrust act? what were the lon
Slav-nsk [51]
I don't know too much about the commerce commission but the sherman antitrust act was created due to bad trusts abusing their powers of having national power over a certain product and therefore holding a monopoly and a sort of dictatorship in a certain field. The sherman antitrust act was the first time the government officially intervened with private businesses and laborers. Pretty much the trusts overworked workers and skyrocketed prices and people complained. I'm blanking on the word for when "the government doesn't interfere with private businesses" but the government finally interfered with this act. 
5 0
3 years ago
Deisn was extension of John Calvin’s teaching? True or false
GalinKa [24]

False...................

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    11·2 answers
  • World Studies Grade 7.
    13·1 answer
  • What on this front page indicates the point of view of the editors of the newspaper? Explain
    6·1 answer
  • How did the advantages of the North(Union) at the start of the Civil War continue to be advantages?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the social context of the mid-19th century influence the creation of
    9·1 answer
  • What is one of the biggest criticisms of the US patriot act
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the first president?
    8·2 answers
  • Helps me pls! Brainliest and 5 points!
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the 2011 earthquake off the coast of Honshu, Japan, is false?
    14·1 answer
  • A large landmass, smaller than a continent
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!