the leader would be Black Hawk
Answer:
Fiscal federalism.
Explanation:
In the federal system of governance, <em>fiscal federalism</em> is <em>used to allocate competencies and fiscal instruments to the different layers of administration</em>. For example, by means of <u>grants </u><u>higher levels of governments share countries resources with the lower level of governance</u>. Such allocation can be unconditional and conditional. Conditional allocations vary both in time and geography. Say, a particular state required grant to promote drug education in classrooms in 2017, but the situation improved and it does not need it anymore.
The answer is A, the first one
1 Throw the current policy, legal and institutional frameworks for combating corruption into the dustbin. They are ill conceived and cannot achieve their intended or presumptive goal(s).
2 Rethink the Ndegwa Report’s recommendation that allowed civil, public and state officers to engage in private business. The fight against corruption shall never get anywhere so long as we allow this conflict of interest.
3 Constitute a multi-disciplinary think tank, comprising intellectuals and practitioners from various fields, to formulate new policy, legal and institutional frameworks for combating corruption. The think-tank should be wary of an ultra-legal, linear or single-dimension approach to corruption.
4 Grant unconditional amnesty to all corrupt acts and omissions from the colonial days to date. The corrupt are too entrenched, having enjoyed unhindered access to state patronage since the colonial days. Any attempt to fight past corruption will never get anywhere. They will easily overrun the best professional teams from our State Law Office, the Police Service and the DPP. In other words, fight corruption prospectively, with effect from the date of the new policy, legal and institutional frameworks set out in
