The effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion is that It exposes how the system does not take responsibility for its actions. Option C
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion?</h3>
Generally, If the Office's findings, conclusions, or recommendations have any legal implications, they must be handled by a Legal Expert, who may be an Advisor, Associate Advisor, Consultant, or another official with relevant credentials and expertise in the law.
In conclusion, By having legal experts on the panel, the interviewer is able to demonstrate how the system avoids accountability. C as a viable alternative
Read more about legal experts
brainly.com/question/1346208
#SPJ1
CQ
What is the effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion?
A. It discredits the impact of the Gault case on the juvenile justice system.
B. It reveals the positive changes to the system that the public ignores.
C. It exposes how the system does not take responsibility for their actions.
D. It offers insight into the state of the juvenile justice system.
Answer:
The position holders of Middle ages did not have an active life.
Explanation:
During the Middle ages, reading, writing, painting and literature was the main focus and are therefore considered as the contemplative era. Also, the clergy person like priest, theologian and monastery stayed away from the public and did not have an active life. Renaissance led to the inclusion of all these sections into the public domain which meant that they also participated actively in society now. Humanism, one of the ideals of Renaissance, means that everyone must live like a normal human being as part of the society. Humanism meant inclusion of all sections and equality for everyone. On the other hand, the religious preachers of that time did not believe in that and this created a challenge that became prevalent during the Reformation.
