<span>According to mcclelland, managers who are extremely concerned about establishing and maintaining good interpersonal relationships have a high need for affiliation. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.</span><span />
Answer:
Sunk costs.
Explanation:
Sunk costs refers to historical funds spent or incurred that cannot be recovered. Such costs are considered irrelevant during decision making which impacts on the business's future as they present no influence on present or future prospects.
Example
ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, money that has been or will be paid regardless of the decision whether to proceed with the project is sunk costs.
Answer:
28.63%
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of preferred stock is shown below:
Cost of the preferred stock = Dividend ÷ Price of the stock
where,
Dividend is
= $1,000 × $15%
= $150
And, the price of the stock is
= Market value of the stock - flotation cost
= $576 - $52
= $524
So, the cost of preferred stock is
= $150 ÷ $524
= 28.63%
We ignored the marginal tax rate i.e 40%
