The crowding-out effect implies that restrictive fiscal policy will reduce real interest rates.
<u>Option: D</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The crowding out effect is the circumstances where greater interest rates consequences gives output of a decline in private investment expenditure so as to dampen the initial rise in overall investment expenditure. Authorities often embraces a restrictive fiscal-policy approach and raises spending to stimulate economic activity. This contributes to interest-rate rises. Higher interest rates have a impact on private investment choices. A high magnitude of the crowding-out impact can also result in lower economic revenue.
Answer:
The options which is NOT correct is C.
Purchasing power does not increase with inrease in the rate of inflation. There is an inverse relationship between inflation and purchasing power of money.
Explanation:
Inflation refers to the overall increase in prices of goods and services and the erosion of the power of the currency to purchase those goods and services. In otherwords, when inflation happens, one requires more dollar bills to purchase same unit of goods or services.
Deflation is the opposite of inflation. It refers to the decrease in the prices of goods and services and is usually accompained by an increase in the purchasing power of the currency.
Nominal interest rate simply put is the interest payable on a loan without considering processing fees, compounding interest payable and the erosion of the value of such money.
Cheers!
Answer:
Bait and Switch
Explanation:
Bait and switch is a deceptive sales technique that draws customers in with the promise of low prices and then "switches" to say that the promised item is not available. It is actually illegal under <em>some </em>circumstances in the United States.
Answer:
$1.05
Explanation:
Mean is 40 quartz per day
standard deviation is 6 quartz per day
Optimal orders = mean demand + Standard deviation
Optimal order = 40 + 6
= 46 quartz per day
$0.35 * 2.84 * 49 / 46
= $1.05
It is difficult to compare relative job growth for different-sized
businesses because it is hard to determine the cutoff point at which a small
business becomes a large business. It is not easy to know the comparative job development
amongst businesses of different sizes. There are not the same parameters leading
the size of a small business versus a big business. Moreover, there is no defined
point where such a variation can be clearly identified.
