1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BigorU [14]
3 years ago
6

What does the campaign to kill the Buffalo contribute to the central ideas of the text?

English
1 answer:
Eva8 [605]3 years ago
5 0

Incomplete question. I inferred from a historical perspective.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Back in the days in which Native Americans also referred to as Indians faced discrimination, the term "Kill the Buffalo" was used as a mockery against the Indian tribes.

This is evident from the fact that nearly all Indian tribes at the time lived alongside buffalo herds and they used the buffalo skin for tents and their meat for food. <em>So, it a sense, it was a campaign to kill</em><em> (destroy) a precious resource </em><em>of the Indians, namely, the Buffalo.</em>

You might be interested in
Help pls and thank u
Rashid [163]

Answer:

1) Noun 2) Verb 3)Noun Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
QUESTION 1 It is important for you, the writer-researcher, to "document quotations, paraphrases, summaries, and information that
soldi70 [24.7K]
<span>
1) The statement is FALSE. It is all about how you perform your job and how professional you are. All the quotations, paraphrases, summaries, and information included in your work must be documented despite the fact that the source is not well known or common.
2. TRUE. If the information is common and, for example, relates to historical events, (which means that many sources provide the same info) you don’t have to cite it. But if you use the information that was found in just one source, you must document it.

3. FALSE. A citation is an act of quoting, that repeats all the words said by someone. The statement “Restates someone else's ideas in fresh words and sentences." is looks more like paraphrase of a piece of information.

4. TRUE. The main function of a summary is to represent the main ideas of the previous source in a precise and concise way. One of the characteristics of an effective summary is the presence of main claims and supporting evidence.

5.  TRUE. Donald Murray was absolutely right. When we come up with something, we only have an image in our head which we have to develop in order to make a conclusion of the idea. Words are our tool to reach the conclusion, they take this image and form a real shape to it.
<span> 
6. FALSE. Donal Murray always stated that writing is built on instructive failure as you attempt to say what you do not yet know in a way you have never said it before. His advice to future writers looks like this: 1. Fail 2. Fail again. 3. Fail better.
<span>
7. TRUE. Donald Murray contends that "When writing, you are more aware of the world and your own reaction to it. As a writer, you relive your life hundred of times...". By these words he means that when you are published - you expose your private thoughts and feelings and share them with people. And when it is released, you afraid to appear foolish or not to be understood.
</span>
<span> 8. The author of this statement is c. Graham Greene. The real name is Henry Graham Greene. He is an English novelist who is considered to be one of the great writers of the 20th century. All his works discuss on moral and political topics of the modern world.

</span><span>
9. The words below belong to Martin Jischke. He is famous for his inspiring speeches for students and being a higher-education administrator the tenth president of Purdue University he poses a role model for everyone.

10. The author of the following words is a. W. Michael Cox. These words are extracted from his book “Myths of rich and poor”. He documented all the American progress and free markets the book, that is considered to be very successful.<span>
</span></span></span></span>
5 0
3 years ago
What is something you could get a girl u like for Christmas​
UNO [17]

Answer:

It depends what they like and ur budget but I believe it's good to give something meaningful to both of u that you can have f9r a long time like jewelry or maybe clothes, stuffed animals if they like it or matching things could also be good

Or I've seen a lot people using things to put a lot of pictures of their loved one as something they can always look at it really depends on the person

(hope this helped)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct answer.
Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Ambiguity in literature refers to all those events, circumstances, story-lines or symbols in a context that carry multiple meanings.

A single element can have several interpretations and this allows the reader to engage in an active manner in the story by wondering about the meanings implied by the author according to personal experiences or reactions.

Ambiguity in literature means that the author is deliberately leaving certain meanings within the text unclear, and so when a reader is analyzing a part of the text, they can come up with multiple meanings, thus A is the correct answer.

5 0
3 years ago
Choose one of the elements of literature, listed below. In the space below, write an essay of at least 500 words comparing and c
MissTica
<span>In these two stories or literary novels"Sixteen" by Maureen Daly and "Through the Tunnel" by Doris Lessing "who are both authors or wordsmiths, Maureen Daly and Doris Lessing" uses a theme, subject, or topic matter of their characters or dramatis personae who are wanting to prove, validate, and justify themselves to someone. However, the differences, distinctions ,or variation of these two stories or literary novels becomes starkly useless , entirely obsolete, and exhaustively and consummately kaput when who or whom the two characters or dramatis personae aspire to prove, validate, and justify themselves to. In "Sixteen" by Maureen Daly the principal character, main character, or dramatis personae seems to be attempting or trying really and truly hard to prove, validate, and justify herself to the reader, that she is insightful and perceptive enough and popular enough to congruous be  telling this story or literary novel. But ​in "Through the Tunnel" Jerry  attempts or tries really and truly hard to prove, validate, and justify himself to the older, mature looking men he looks up to and withal to himself. Throughout each story or literary novel, the characters or dramatis personae attempt or try to prove, validate, and justify something to themselves or other people or characters. In Doris Lessing's short story  or literary novel"Through the Tunnel"" by Doris Lessing" the principal character, main character, or dramatis personae who or whom we can apperceive or apperceive as Jerry  opportunely  accommodated or made acquaintance himself with a group of older, mature looking men hanging around in a wild-looking bay, cove ,or estuary full of rocks. These two completely and totally different  short stories or literary novels  "Sixteen" by Maureen Daly and "Through the Tunnel" by Doris Lessing are both chock full of  kindred spirits predicated on the absolute fact that both characters or dramatis personae attempt </span> <span>or try to prove, validate, and justify something to someone, but they are  different because those someones are different in these two stories or literary novel. While both stories or literary novels are starkly different in subject, theme ,or topic matter that both principal characters, main characters, or dramatis personae attempt or try to prove, validate, and justify themselves to someone. In "Sixteen," by Maureen Daly it is the reader. In the story or literary novels "Through the Tunnel," by Doris Lessing it is the older, mature looking men and later himself that makes Jerry to push past his inhibitions and fears and conquer or overcome them . The second homogeneous or same attribute or kindred characteristic between the two stories or literary novels is that the people or characters who had transpired to repeal the principal characters, main characters ,or dramatis personae which of course whom never present themselves again, are the leading cause that  prompts  both characters or dramatis personae in these two stories or  literary novels by of course being ostentatious with their earnest and veracious and genuine general and exhaustively simply authentic and true feelings and motivations all throughout these two stories or literary novels.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does the Friar mean when he says that " Young men's love then lies not truly in their hearts, but in their eyes."
    6·1 answer
  • Richard connell describe the coastline "as an broken front of snarled and ragged jungle" why does he use the word "snarled"
    11·1 answer
  • ⚠️WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT, PLEASE ANSWER ASAP⚠️
    7·2 answers
  • What is the answer for the word study
    11·1 answer
  • What is called to make someone serve in the military?
    9·1 answer
  • Help will mark brainly
    15·2 answers
  • What are some examples of anti-Jewish laws?
    15·2 answers
  • People with (blank) interests rarely suffer from boredom.
    11·1 answer
  • English I need help writing 4 paragraph about a good topic that affects teens and that doesn’t involve social media addiction an
    12·1 answer
  • . We ............. a great meal in the new restaurant last night.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!