Answer:
Hypothalamus
Explanation:
Most of these behaviors are related to a person's hormones. Hormones are influenced by the Hypothalamus. This is a tiny part at the base of the brain close to the <u><em>pituitary gland</em></u>. The hypothalamus is in charge of releasing hormones, regulating body temperatures, controlling appetite, sexual behavior, and regulating emotional responses. Which falls in perfectly with all the behaviors in the question.
Answer:
When thee U.S. faced several cases in which plaintiffs challenged the constituitionality of Espionage and Sedition Acts The supreme court
Upheld the government authority to restrict free speech in times of crisis.
Explanation:
When the supreme court faced several cases in which the U.S. security was put into danger it decided to support the U.S. call to restrict free speech because it was dangerous for the country to let people talk about certain topics. Spy nets are always very wary and in those cases, they reunited information to enemies of the U.S. to damage them in all the ways they could. Therefore the court decided to endorse the scrutiny to deal with them because it guaranteed U.S. security.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
The first session of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution reads as follows:
<em>"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside. the United States, nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws ".
</em>
The language of the Constitution is very clear. Every citizen born or naturalized in the United States has the right to jurisdiction. That is, in the national territory, these people have the right to legal immunity, must enjoy freedom, property and due process of law.
In this way, states can not deny any of these groups nor withdraw their rights if there is no crime and the resulting conviction.
Answer:
true is the answer of the question
