Answer:
Answered
Explanation:
In this example of research, Dr. O'Malley is obtaining informed consent from his participants as he openly told the participants to that their participation is completely voluntary and that they can stop taking part at any time. Dr. Quick is debriefing her participants.
I think the voyage of Amerigo Vespucci was the most important because it showed all of Europe that what Christopher Columbus thought was the indies was actually new undiscovered land.
Answer:
promissory estoppel
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Kenneth can sue his parents under the doctrine of a promissory estoppel. This is a doctrine which prevents an individual/group from abiding to a promise, even if that promise was not made into a legal written contract. Such as is the case in this scenario since Kenneth's parents promised to deed him the ranch.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Your question is incomplete. You forgot to include the question and also the options.
However, doing some research, we can answer the following.
The correct question should be <em>"Miss Kempt's strategies that actually contribute to Haley's behavior include all of the following except:"</em>
If that is the case, then the correct answer is "understanding that the interaction between Miss Kempt and Haley can impact the learning process."
The other possible question would be<em> "Is Miss Kempt doing anything that actually contributes to Haley's poor behavior?"</em>
If that is the case, the correct answer would be the following.
If the teacher is really yelling at Haley, that clearly is a mistake. However, Dr. Karr has to listen to the teacher's arguments first, before making any decision. There would be a real motive for the way Miss Kempt treat Haley. We do not know if Haley is telling the truth or if he is interpreting the situation to his own convenience. So Dr. Karr has to collect enough evidence before taking any action.