Answer:
As a risk minimizer : Stock A has the lowest standard deviation, thus, it should be chosen, if it is to be held in isolation . Also stock B has the lowest beta, thus,it should be chosen, if it is to be held as part of a well - diversified portfolio.
The answer is A and B respectively
Explanation:
The standalone risk or standard deviation of the stocks is alleviated for a well diversified investor . So, in that case, the relevant risk would be the market risk or the beta.
When you see in isolation, relevant risk would be the standard deviation.
Therefore, as a risk minimizer : Stock A has the lowest standard deviation, thus, it should be chosen, if it is to be held in isolation . Also stock B has the lowest beta, thus,it should be chosen, if it is to be held as part of a well - diversified portfolio.
Answer:
Eminent domain for the public good.
Explanation:
He charged the branch manager because he didn't see eminent domain for public use.
In eminent domain the government, the government the government has the power to take private property for public use.
The bank is a public place and as such are required to have a public domain that is members of the public or for civic use. Such a party is likely going to be for public use or it could be delegated to third parties.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Critics of globalization claim that, as globalization increases, countries' sovereignty (the freedom of national officials to act locally and without externally imposed restrictions) is diminished because as some of them say 'it is an economic tsunami', in the sense that - people of other countries 'invade' a country in the name of globalization and the locals of that country are expected to curtail their local customs and individual behavior to accommodate the foreigners. Also foreigners take some of the jobs that are available in the country to the 'detriment' of the locals
Secondly, 'the resulting growth consistently benefits the environment', because the gains of migration are not shared commonly among the locals, rather they could be invested in environmental projects to boost Tourism and attract more foreigners.
Thirdly, the statement that 'Some people lose both relatively and absolutely, and greater insecurity increases a personal stress.'is true because in cities like London and most other European capitals we have seen an increase in crime alongside the rise in immigration and globalization
Answer:
B. Herbania is technologically superior to Duckistan in producing civilian goods.
Explanation:
Duckistan Production Possibilities
A B C D E
Civilian Goods 20 18 14 8 0
Military Goods 0 1 2 3 4
opportunity cost - ¹/₁₈ ¹/₇ ³/₈ 4 civilian goods
opportunity cost 20 18 7 2.7 - military goods
Herbania Production Possibilities
A B C D E
Civilian Goods 40 36 26 14 0
Military Goods 0 1 2 3 4
opportunity cost - ¹/₃₆ ¹/₁₃ ³/₁₄ 4 civilian goods
opportunity cost 40 36 13 4.7 - military goods
Herbania has an absolute advantage in the production of civilian goods. Since it also has a lower opportunity cost of producing civilian goods, therefore, it also has a comparative advantage at producing civilian goods. Assuming that resources are equal in both countries, then we can assume that Herbania is technologically superior in the production of civilian goods.
Dukistan has a lower opportunity cost of producing military goods, therefore, it has a comparative advantage at producing military goods.
