Asking good questions promote critical thinking because if a person was able to be provided with sensible and good questions, his or her critical thinking will be of help and will be of benefit to the person, making it to be promoted as the question is sensible and the use of his or her critical thinking has become something that he or she will made use of and will be something worth it.
Answer:
$4.44
Explanation:
P0 = $2.40 / 1.08+ $2.40 / 1.08 = $4. 44
Your answer would be they offer Higher interest rates.
Answer:
<em>B. Yes, although it may be breached in most states if there is a court order to do so.</em>
Explanation:
<em>Duty of confidentiality is a provision that has been put in place in most states, to enable clients open up freely if they need help. This allows professionals to take whatever actions necessary to carry out full service delivery when helping the client. </em>Some of these details include health status, a client-lawyer case story, a social media's access to users' personal details, etc. The law prohibits professionals from disclosing information made available to them by the client to a third party. This duty is held by many professional bodies like the medical body, legal body, among others. <em>This duty can be broken by law in situations where the client sues the professional, or when there is a legal court order to do so</em>.
Answer:
If patty sues, the likely result is:
D. Patty may win under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
Explanation:
Here, in the given question it is mentioned that Patty is a student who is poor and he is struggling to work and also keep up with her studies inspite of the difficulties.
Her uncle, Fred, promises patty that he will help him in this situation and help her with an amount of $200 per month for the next six months.
Although her uncle, Fred didn't ask her to but patty by herself quits her job so that she gives her maximum time and attention to her studies for the six months in which her uncle was going to help her.
According to what hr uncle promised he gave her the amount which he promised to but this was done for a month and then without saying anything or giving any reason he stopped giving her the amount he promised to.
So, now in this scenario if patty sues the likely result would be:
d. Patty may win under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
