<span>The answer is preemption. The preemption doctrine raises to
the idea that a higher authority of law will move the law of a lower authority
of law when the two authorities come into conflict or encounter. When federal
and state law conflict, federal law shifts, or preempts, state law, due to
the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. U.S. Const. art. VI.,
§ 2. Preemption relates nevertheless of whether the conflicting laws come
from legislatures, courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions. For instance,
the Voting Rights Act, an
act of Congress, anticipates state constitutions, and FDA regulations may
preempt state court judgments in cases concerning prescription drugs.</span>
Answer: Accommodating
Explanation: Every mode of conflict resolution comes with its own positives and negatives. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode identifies five conflict styles and provides guidelines or rules regarding when each is appropriate in a conflict situation. For the situation in the question above, Mr. Chin should apply the accommodating conflict handling style when trying to resolve matters with Brad. Accommodating describes when a person is cooperative, but not assertive wherein they try to satisfy the other person’s concerns (in this case Xerox copiers) at the expense of their own (the copiers currently used by the office). The result is to give in or yield which in turn promotes peace, collaboration, harmony, good-will and reciprocity.
Accommodating doesn't come without its drawbacks which is mostly felt by the person themselves giving in themselves.
Base on the given scenario, Rhonda should file a complaint
to the EEOC and not just in any court that she pleases. EEOC or also known as
the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the one responsible of
administering laws with the citizens in terms of discrimination that they may
experience in the workplace of which Rhonda felt and experienced.
The reanalysis of data that was originally gathered for other purposes or by other researchers is an example of secondary analysis.
Secondary analysis is the practice of the use of secondary information in studies. As a studies approach, it saves both money and time and avoids unnecessary duplication of research efforts. Secondary evaluation is usually contrasted with number one evaluation, that is the evaluation of primary information independently accrued by a researcher.
Secondary evaluation is a form of research that makes use of current records, or secondary information, amassed formerly to carry out a brand new observation. Researchers may use quantitative or qualitative facts some other research crew or business enterprise accrued or produced for specific motives and examine it in a brand new way.
The secondary analysis involves a researcher using the information that a person else has gathered for his or her own purposes. Researchers leverage secondary information analysis and try to answer a new study's query or to take a look at an alternative angle at the unique query of a previous observation.
Learn more about Secondary analysis here brainly.com/question/6032141
#SPJ4
