1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WITCHER [35]
3 years ago
15

The united states sets ___ on how many immigrants could come into the country​

Social Studies
2 answers:
Musya8 [376]3 years ago
6 0
Currently, no group of permanent immigrants (family-based and employment-based) from a single country can exceed seven percent of the total amount of people immigrating to the United States in a single fiscal year.
diamong [38]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

<h2>A 7% Limit</h2>

Explanation:

The amount of people permanently immigrating into the United States from a single country can be no more than 7% of the total amount of people immigrating in one fiscal year. This is done to make sure that there is a good variety of different home countries.

<em>PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST</em>

You might be interested in
If you answer correctly i give brainliest .,.
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

For World War 2 it was fought in France, Great Britain, the United States, China.

For world war 1 Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey—against the Allies—mainly France, Great Britain, Russia, Italy, Japan, and the US

America's involvement in World War II had a significant impact on the economy and workforce of the United States. American factories were retooled to produce goods to support the war effort and almost overnight the unemployment rate dropped to around 10%

World War 2 ended with the unconditional surrender of the Axis powers. On 8 May 1945, the Allies accepted Germany's surrender, about a week after Adolf Hitler had committed su***de.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
According to chudleigh what should women learn to vslue
Ulleksa [173]
Learn to value yourselves. 
6 0
3 years ago
1. Why do you think the framers put the President in charge of the military instead of a military general?
victus00 [196]

Answer:

Explanation:

While the President customarily delegates supreme command of the forces in active service, there is no constitutional reason why he should do so, and he has been known to resolve personally important questions of military policy. Lincoln early in 1862 issued orders for a general advance in the hopes of stimulating McClellan to action; Wilson in 1918 settled the question of an independent American command on the Western Front; Truman in 1945 ordered that the bomb be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.206 As against an enemy in the field, the President possesses all the powers which are accorded by international law to any supreme commander. “He may invade the hostile country, and subject it to the sovereignty and authority of the United States.”207 In the absence of attempts by Congress to limit his power, he may establish and prescribe the jurisdiction and procedure of military commissions, and of tribunals in the nature of such commissions, in territory occupied by Armed Forces of the United States, and his authority to do this sometimes survives cessation of hostilities.208 He may employ secret agents to enter the enemy’s lines and obtain information as to its strength, resources, and movements.209 He may, at least with the assent of Congress, authorize commercial intercourse with the enemy.210 He may also requisition property and compel services from American citizens and friendly aliens who are situated within the theater of military operations when necessity requires, thereby incurring for the United States the obligation to render “just compensation.”211 By the same warrant, he may bring hostilities to a conclusion by arranging an armistice, stipulating conditions that may determine to a great extent the ensuing peace.212 He may not, however, effect a permanent acquisition of territory,213 though he may govern recently acquired territory until Congress sets up a more permanent regime.214

8 0
3 years ago
How does interdependence happen globally
OLEGan [10]
Working together between countries
5 0
3 years ago
What can be inferred about a young mother willing to give up her children in order to continue her life of drug addiction?
GarryVolchara [31]
You can infer that the young mothers addiction had started off from an early life because maybe somebody in her family used the substance and so she got pulled into the same cycle , or she experimented and got addicted. you can also tell that she’s been doing it for a long time because she’s willing to give up her children and the chance to give them a life of their own instead of giving up the drugs that satisfy her selfish needs. ( hope this helped )
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How can justices play a significant role in influencing policy by not taking a case?
    6·1 answer
  • If you were to make a trip somewhere in the world, where would you find the richest historical evidences of early travel?
    9·1 answer
  • A group of chimpanzees becomes separated into two groups by a mountain so that the two groups no longer interact with one anothe
    12·1 answer
  • The brain is connected to the __________at the brain stem.
    9·1 answer
  • Are black people still suffer from racism and inequality between white people in US? If yes then write the steps should be taken
    5·2 answers
  • According to developmental theory, criminal opportunity and apprehension risk are __________ factors that can explain the onset
    7·1 answer
  • Question: Conventional farming creates problems for the environment. An international team of experts proposed some steps to hel
    9·1 answer
  • What type of material was used to build Great Wall
    13·2 answers
  • What is the example of metasearch engine
    6·1 answer
  • Based on the illustrations above how do you describe water when it is heat or cooled​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!