This best illustrates the impact of "context effect ".
A context effect is a part of cognitive psychology that
depicts the impact of natural factors on one's view of a stimulus. The effect
of context effects<span> is thought to be a piece of top down outline.
The idea is upheld by the hypothetical way to deal with observation known as constructive perception.</span>
Answer: 25%
Explanation: Smartphones are certainly an inevitable part of the everyday life of the modern technological age. It is almost impossible to imagine a day-to-day life without the use of smartphones for a variety of purposes, from using a variety of applications through common calls, etc. The said age range of 18-44 years, which means from teens to middle-aged people, where as many as 25%, which is a quarter of this age population, do not remember when they left the phone for five minutes. Probably nothing terrible would happen in those five minutes, but that speaks to how widespread the use of smartphones is. Teens are known to use it for a variety of applications for different needs, while these phones can also serve the business of middle-aged people. This phenomenon may be a matter of prestige and perhaps a matter of need and habit, but it is a familiar cliché that these 25% do not want to leave their phones even for five minutes.
Explanation:
(a) Experimental unit
A person or an object, or some well-defined body or item on which some treatment is applied
(b) Treatment
Combination of a values of factors. These are explanatory variables.
(c) Response variable
The qualitative variable or quantitative variable in which the researcher wants to determine how the value is affected by any explanatory variable.
(d) Factor
It is the variable whose influence on a response variable can be assessed by the researcher.
(e) Placebo
An innocuous treatment, like a sugar tablet, which looks, smells and tastes like an experimental medication.
(f) Confounding
The effect of the two factors cannot be distinguished.
Answer:
- Large farms
- Experienced military leaders
- Miles of coastline
Explanation:
You included no options so I listed the three main areas the South had an advantage over the North at the time of the Civil war.
The South was mostly a plantation based economy which meant that they had large farms and was why they felt they needed so many enslaved people.
They also had the advantage of having more experienced military leaders such as General Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson and General Robert Edward Lee. Their presence ensured that the Confederate army was able to withstand a better armed and supplied Union army for years.
The South also had the advantage of miles of coastline that enabled them to for a time, withstand the Union blockade of her ports that were imposed as soon as the Civil war broke out.
