1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vova2212 [387]
3 years ago
13

What examples of hypocrisy in the founding of the U.S. does Hannah-Jones supply? What evidence can you see for how “some might a

rgue that this nation was founded not as a democracy but as a slavocracy”? I need help
Law
1 answer:
VashaNatasha [74]3 years ago
3 0

This question is incomplete. Here´s the complete question.

Read “The Idea of America” by Nikole Hannah-Jones

What examples of hypocrisy in the founding of the U.S. does Hannah-Jones supply? What evidence can you see for how “some might argue that this nation was founded not as a democracy but as a slavocracy”?

Answer:

Hannah-Jones explains the hypocrisy of a democracy based on slavery.

Explanation:

She finds hypocrisy in Jefferson’s original draft of the Declaration of Independence blaming the king of England for enforcing slavery on supposably reluctant colonists. In reality, the founders had no intention of abolishing slavery, so that passage got erased.

Therefore, the Declaration of Independence doesn´t even mention slavery and the Constitution would go as far as preserving that institution.

You might be interested in
Which of the following best describe the rule of four
UNO [17]

The statement that describes the rule of four is the supreme court uses the rule of four to determine whether a case will be granted a writ of certiorari.

<h3>What is a rule of four?</h3>

A rule of four refers to the supreme court's practice of granting a petition for review only if there are at least four votes to do so.

The missing options in the question are

The supreme court uses the rule of four after they have heard a case to decide whether they will issue an opinion on the case.The supreme court uses the rule of four to determine whether a case will be granted a writ of certiorari.It refers to the number of votes required to make a majority decision in court.The rule of four refers to the number of justices it takes to form a minority opinion on a case.

The statement that best describes the rule of four is that the supreme court uses the rule of four to determine whether a case will be granted a writ of certiorari.

Therefore, B is the correct option.

Learn more about the rule of four here:

brainly.com/question/24264497

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
A high school principal has reason to suspect some students of bringing weapons on to campus. After receiving a tip from a teach
omeli [17]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Campus authorites are allowed to search lockers because anything brought on campus or that belongs to the school there allowed to search

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Auto insurance is: A) required by law B) required in a few states C) optional if your car and house are paid off D) an optional
blagie [28]

Auto insurance is required by law

What is auto insurance?

At its simplest form, auto insurance is the insurance coverage that caters for third parties or victims of auto accidents that are not the drivers, in that , it takes care of their medical expenses and further damages caused to them.

Auto insurance is mandatory in 49 out of the 50 states in the US, in other words, it is not in anyway optional, which means that option C and D are obviously incorrect.

The second option is also wrong since 49 out of 50 cannot be regarded as few states, in short, it is most appropriate to conclude that it is required by the law, which means option A is the most appropriate in this case.

Find out more about auto insurance on:brainly.com/question/1490222

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
If a defendant can prove ____________, the plaintiff is completely barred from recovering any damages
NeTakaya

Answer:

the contributory negligence claim,

Explanation:

''If the defendant is able to prove the contributory negligence claim, the plaintiff may be totally barred from recovering damages or her damages may be reduced to reflect her role in the resulting injury. ''

8 0
2 years ago
QUESTION 4
Naya [18.7K]

Answer:

b. they are more engaged with politics

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How old does one have to be in order to vote?
    5·1 answer
  • What does strike the last word mean in impeachment hearing
    5·1 answer
  • What does the author argue is most responsible for America’s wealth?
    5·1 answer
  • How did this item help law enforcement connect James Perry to the murders of Mildred and Trevor Horn?
    6·1 answer
  • The framers of the Constitution wanted the source of political power to rest with
    10·2 answers
  • What the conflict of interest And desires according to law​
    7·1 answer
  • Explain what happens to the gravitational force between two objects if
    14·2 answers
  • The power to create and maintain a police force, which is exercised at the state and local level, is considered one of these pow
    12·1 answer
  • Why is diversity in law enforcement important?
    8·2 answers
  • In a criminal case, who is responsible for deciding on a sentence? judge jury executioner bailiff
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!