1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svetlana [45]
1 year ago
7

Which of the following best describe the rule of four

Law
1 answer:
UNO [17]1 year ago
6 0

The statement that describes the rule of four is the supreme court uses the rule of four to determine whether a case will be granted a writ of certiorari.

<h3>What is a rule of four?</h3>

A rule of four refers to the supreme court's practice of granting a petition for review only if there are at least four votes to do so.

The missing options in the question are

The supreme court uses the rule of four after they have heard a case to decide whether they will issue an opinion on the case.The supreme court uses the rule of four to determine whether a case will be granted a writ of certiorari.It refers to the number of votes required to make a majority decision in court.The rule of four refers to the number of justices it takes to form a minority opinion on a case.

The statement that best describes the rule of four is that the supreme court uses the rule of four to determine whether a case will be granted a writ of certiorari.

Therefore, B is the correct option.

Learn more about the rule of four here:

brainly.com/question/24264497

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Do maryland police officers have to let victims know their rights
jenyasd209 [6]
If you are a victim, under Maryland law: Police must inform you of your basic rights as a victim so the answer is yes.
I hope it helps
Can you please give me a brainliest answer because I am just one more tk get my other rank pls ☺️
3 0
2 years ago
PLZ ANSWER BOTH QUESTIONS!!!
Arlecino [84]

Domestic violence is the standard used for insanity defense to produce good result and Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a change but never changing anything is the standard used for least use of insanity defense.

Explanation:

The advantage of insanity defense is that the accused could avoid penalized with death, even if he is guilty. In the context of crime the sentence is very convenient as compared with an accused who is proven to be guilty, but it is not proven.

The insanity defense is rarely used because of the difficulty in providing legal insanity. Many criminal defendants suffer from mental illness and produce evidence of this illness such as psychiatric testimony.

Hence,  Domestic violence is the standard used for insanity defense to produce good result because it changes person completely and Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a change but never changing anything is the standard used for least use of insanity defense.

7 0
3 years ago
Do you agree or disagree that the state should build roads with the help of federal funds? Is it fair for all states to give mon
vivado [14]

Answer:

Yes I agree and yes it is fair to give money to another state to build roads because it decrease power centralisation and promotes unity in action.

Explanation:

  • This directly relates to the system of checks and balances.
  • It is the system designed to reduce the effects of centralisation of power by ensuring that no single authority has complete control over decisions and promotes cooperation.
  • For Example: The tripartite system practiced in different countries where judicial, legislative and executive aspects of government has equal authorities in amending or removing the law.
  • In regard to projects like building roads other states can cooperate with one state to improve its infrastructure for equitable development.
5 0
3 years ago
In a criminal court case, who recommends a sentence to the judge?
Lesechka [4]

Answer:

The people who most commonly speak at a sentencing hearing are the prosecutors, the defense attorney, the victims, and the defendant. Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure grants both the defendant and defense counsel the right to speak to the court before a sentence is imposed. First, even before a defendant appears before a judge, prosecutors may agree, as part of a plea agreement, to recommend a lower sentence or to charge a less serious crime in exchange for the defendant's cooperation.

6 0
2 years ago
Can someone tell me if this is correct
lakkis [162]

Answer:

not mistaking it is correct

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Rawls and Nozick both agree that : a)the law should embody no conception of the good life b)in the name of liberty the governmen
    5·2 answers
  • The ancient remains of several human bodies have been discovered and legally need to be returned to the tribe that contains the
    7·1 answer
  • 1. A person designated by the court whose knowledge exceeds the knowledge of anyone with a
    7·1 answer
  • What are the three levels of court in the United States?
    5·2 answers
  • Which amendment outlaws cruel and unusual punishment
    15·1 answer
  • Should "the
    9·1 answer
  • which supreme court case determined that the death penalty could not be used on people with mental disabilities?
    12·1 answer
  • Kevin is a crime scene investigator who has to work alone looking for evidence in an apartment where a homicide occurred. Which
    13·2 answers
  • Consequences for breaking alcohol selling laws include�
    9·1 answer
  • In court cases the ________ is the party that brings charges and the ________ is the party accused of a violation of the law.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!