The ability of Roberto to make a conclusion statement relating to the barking of dogs is an example of deductive reasoning.
<h3>What is the reasoning?</h3>
Reasoning is the process of making conclusions, and predictions, and giving explanations on the basis of existing knowledge. There are two kinds of reasoning namely, inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
Deductive reasoning is an approach where a common statement is cited and then concluded in a more specific statement. it is also considered as using a top to down logic. in the provided question, 'all dogs bark' is the common statement and a dog in his neighborhood called Spot also barks is the specific statement made by Robert.
Therefore, the conclusion given by Robert is considered an example of deductive reasoning.
Learn more about the reasoning in the provided link:
brainly.com/question/1250454
#SPJ1
Answer:
D
Explanation:
the amazon is the largest river shown on the map
The first three options refer more to the emphasis on the environment: they emphasize the environmentally friendly way of production through recycling, limiting waste and using renewable resources: they don't say anything about the quality of the production.
The correct answer is: Natural resources are very important.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
For the ethical researcher, the major problem with deception is that it tends to involve direct attacks on other people’s consent.
And of course, that is not ethical and professional researchers and companies shouldn't ever do that.
Researchers need to be very honest and clear about the purpose of research, the instruments used, the risks -if there are any- and the way results are going to be used.
Researchers also have to get the written consent from the people that are going to be part of the study. This way, participants are going to be aware of any details.
