Answer:
C- Formal operational stage of cognitive development
Explanation:
Formal Operational Stage of Cognitive Development can be seen as the way a person find solution to a problem by manipulating ideas in their mind which help them to find answer to the problem thereby using it to solve such problem.
The formal operational stage is a stage which often begins at the age of twelve and lasts into adulthood.
At this stage, a person begin to have the ability to always think in an abstract way in other to know the way to tackle or attack a problem because the person is able to plan quickly which help them to find a way to solving a problem.
Therefore Her ability to generate experimental attacks to a problem indicates that she is in Piaget's FORMAL OPERATIONAL STAGE OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT.
Lacey is likely to suggest that conformity and obedience in
which she reviewed from the literature is not necessarily bad and by that a
person or an individual is considered to be important for the formation of an
orderly society.
Waning Crescent and Waxing Crescent.
Dr. Asgard's views are most consistent with those of Edward Titchener. Dr. Asgard believes that in order to fully understand complex processes, such as auditory processing, it is first necessary to understand all the separate component parts. Similarly, Titchener believed that all thoughts can be broken down to basic elements, specifically, sensations.
According to Titchener, when you recognize the thing, you combine recollections of previous sensations (color, shape, texture, smell, and taste). He was a fervent supporter of psychology as a science and felt it was essential to categorize the parts of the mind because science dealt with facts, not theories.
Hence, Dr. Asgard views match with Edward Tichener’s view because they follow the same procedure of Structuralism.
To know more about structuralism, refer this link :
brainly.com/question/14646811
#SPJ4
Answer: the correct anwer is A. A suit seeking to assert the interest of state citizens in retaining diplomatic relations with a foreign nation.
Explanation:
Under the Article III, section 2, the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and in which the state is a party. In option A, the state is trying to act in parents patriae which is to act as representative of its citizens thereby asserting their interests that is to say that the state is not a party in the case. In all other case the state is a party and has incumbency in the matter.
